PiStorm Chat

[exxos]

I have just realised the performance is even better if using 800x600x256 so the earlier tests can offer better Display performance
If anyone @exxos has GB6 results for PAK030 with ALT-RAM or results for any other high performance setups, could they send me them please

You should have all these in GB6

CT6066 - CT60 @ 66mhz
DEFAULT - STE TOS 206 8mhz stock
STE20608 - same as above
STE20616 - STE TOS 206 @ 16mhz
STE20632 - STE TOS 206 @ 32mhz
FALCON30 - Stock falcon
STFMT28 - STFM running T28 booster (thanks Sophie)
STFM1048 - STFM TOS 104 @ 8mhz (stock machine)
PAK030 - STacy with PAK 030 booster (thanks Darklord)
CT6090SV - CT60 @ 90mhz with Supder Videl (Thanks Fredrik)
MSTEB8 - MEGA STE BLITTER TOS 206
MSTEB16 - MEGA STE BLITTER TOS 206 16MHz
MSTEB16C - MEGA STE BLITTER TOS 206 16MHz CACHE ENABLED
PAK020 - PAK 020 STFM 16MHz
PAK020CD - PAK 020 STFM 16MHz with CACHE DISABLED
PAK02016 - PAK020 Booster running 16MHz (thanks Frank Lucas) - obsolete file ?
STE20682 - STE TOS 206 @ 8MHz 2 Colours - thanks IngoQ
ST20616 - STFM TOS 206 16MHz (V2.2 BOOSTER)
VELOCE - STE 020 BOOSTER
ST1048B - STFM TOS 104 8MHz BLITTER ON
ST2068B - STFM TOS 206 8MHz BLITTER ON
206STFPU - MSTE TOS206 LINEF FPU EMULATION

CT60 be the ones to go for. Not sure if the tests were running from allt-ram or not after all this time though. So maybe someone can do a new benchmark if they have a CT60'ed Falcon ?

[Darklord]

Just for accuracy's sake, the Pak 68/3 results I turned in with
my STacy are at 40mhz (both '030 CPU and 68882 FPU) and
no Alt-RAM...

Thanks.

[exxos]

Just for accuracy's sake, the Pak 68/3 results I turned in with
my STacy are at 40mhz (both '030 CPU and 68882 FPU) and
no Alt-RAM...

I think at the time I requested all tests be run from ST-RAM to keep it getting confusing. Though at the time, there was pretty much no alt-ram solutions to test anyway.

I guess I really need some new benchmark files with alt-ram involved.

[mrbombermillzy]

Not sure if this has been discussed already, but would it be a good idea to also define between ALTRAM and TTRAM testing at some point too?

[Steve]

I always thought they were classed as the same thing in Atari-land. But I do understand alt-ram works in the standard ST 68k address space (limiting it to like 6-8mb?) And TT RAM is in 32bit address space with infinitely more available. Perhaps TT RAM is more of a misnomer, it was only called that because the TT was the first Atari machine to offer extended memory.

[mrbombermillzy]

I always thought they were classed as the same thing in Atari-land. But I do understand alt-ram works in the standard ST 68k address space (limiting it to like 6-8mb?) And TT RAM is in 32but address space with infinitely more available.

Its also faster, as its not the system bus speed but the boosted CPU speed.

[exxos]

In GB6 is could flag altram or TTram. Though I'd assume anything but a 68000 would be actually TTram anyway. But I don't think we should drive into all that in this thread anyway :)

[frank.lukas]

GB for a PAK030-50Mhz and ET4000

https://forum.atari-home.de/index.php/t ... #msg229653

[dad664npc]

I have just realised the performance is even better if using 800x600x256 so the earlier tests can offer better Display performance
If anyone @exxos has GB6 results for PAK030 with ALT-RAM or results for any other high performance setups, could they send me them please

You should have all these in GB6

CT6066 - CT60 @ 66mhz
DEFAULT - STE TOS 206 8mhz stock
STE20608 - same as above
STE20616 - STE TOS 206 @ 16mhz
STE20632 - STE TOS 206 @ 32mhz
FALCON30 - Stock falcon
STFMT28 - STFM running T28 booster (thanks Sophie)
STFM1048 - STFM TOS 104 @ 8mhz (stock machine)
PAK030 - STacy with PAK 030 booster (thanks Darklord)
CT6090SV - CT60 @ 90mhz with Supder Videl (Thanks Fredrik)
MSTEB8 - MEGA STE BLITTER TOS 206
MSTEB16 - MEGA STE BLITTER TOS 206 16MHz
MSTEB16C - MEGA STE BLITTER TOS 206 16MHz CACHE ENABLED
PAK020 - PAK 020 STFM 16MHz
PAK020CD - PAK 020 STFM 16MHz with CACHE DISABLED
PAK02016 - PAK020 Booster running 16MHz (thanks Frank Lucas) - obsolete file ?
STE20682 - STE TOS 206 @ 8MHz 2 Colours - thanks IngoQ
ST20616 - STFM TOS 206 16MHz (V2.2 BOOSTER)
VELOCE - STE 020 BOOSTER
ST1048B - STFM TOS 104 8MHz BLITTER ON
ST2068B - STFM TOS 206 8MHz BLITTER ON
206STFPU - MSTE TOS206 LINEF FPU EMULATION

CT60 be the ones to go for. Not sure if the tests were running from allt-ram or not after all this time though. So maybe someone can do a new benchmark if they have a CT60'ed Falcon ?

Yep GB has all of those - but it now needs up to date results I feel - accelerators and the like. So, anyone out there that has any of these fancy additions, please submit your GB6 result files

[dad664npc]

PiStorm-Atari 68020 offers optimal results in most cases

The following two results are against CT hardware
ref CT6066

screendump20.png

ref CT6090SV

screendump21.png