TF536 + Spectre GCR is slower than stock.

Other boosters or variants.
User avatar
stephen_usher
Site sponsor
Site sponsor
Posts: 7388
Joined: 13 Nov 2017 19:19
Location: Oxford, UK.

TF536 + Spectre GCR is slower than stock.

Post by stephen_usher »

Here's a strange thing I decided to experiment with the TF536 and see how much faster MacOS under Spectre GCR was when running on a 68030. Both Spectre GCR and MacOS know about the 68030. Indeed, there are options in Spectre GCR 3.0 to enable the caches and burst mode.

So I first ran Speedometer 3.06 under MacOS System 6.0.7 using the 68000 to get a baseline benchmark. As expected it was about 20% faster than an original Mac:
IMG_2182.jpg
I then shut down, switch off and swapped over to the TF536 and did the same thing. Speedometer recognised the 68030 in the system info. To my surprise it was actually *SLOWER*.
IMG_2183.jpg
Here's the comparison table (poor photo):
IMG_2185.jpg
My only guess is that Spectre GCR is somehow compensating for the CPU speed so as to make sure the system runs at the same speed as the original Mac Plus/512Ke. Very strange.

For reference, which is what I get with my SE/30, which has a lower clocked 68030 (but faster memory).
IMG_2181.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Intro retro computers since before they were retro...
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.

Return to “EVERYTHING ELSE”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 2 guests