I guess in a way its good I decided to reduce the number of ROM combinations I was selling in my store as they doubling in price would mean I would have to reduce my stock anyway.
FlashyClock is really the future aim anyway for ROM's.

The PROMs themselves are getting expensive, and don't even *think* about looking at what EEPROM equivalents cost these daysstephen_usher wrote: Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:13 pm The alternative would be to have a ROM repository and sell a PCB which acts as an adapter for readily available DIP EEPROM writers, such as the TL866II Plus, plus a stock of blank PROMs. Effectively a DIY kit.
I designed an adapter board and I can give you the full KiCAD and Gerber files for it if you like.

Problem there is, if I were to develop such a alternative solution, I might as well just spend the time to port flashy clock over to the STE instead.. It all comes down to lack of time for multiple projects which is why I basically dropped any new STE / Falcon stuff.. Its not just getting stuff to work, its getting it to work with random variables across multiple motherboard revisions and tolerances etc. Plus every time I pickup a original board off my shelf, I have to spend 1-2 hours trying to get the thing working again before I can actually do the addons, over the years its just drove me nuts.olivier.jan wrote: Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:33 pm FlashyClock is clearly a very neat solution and will most likely be the best solution for STF.STEs on the other hand might be a problem with their PLCC CPUs.
Yes, the 3.3v extension of the H5 is a blessing.exxos wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 3:06 pm 5volt items are just inherently going to get more expensive, it is why I would just rather spend the time developing on the H5 platform, as I can now use 3.3V (or lower ) parts which are lower cost and more plentiful.