Anyone seen or know anything about this ...
I have contacted them to see what their licensing policy is....
While I am clocking 32 MHz, I was looking at moving towards 64Mhz with the 68SEC000 CPU, but I think there will be bottlenecks in terms of SRAM & ROM access speeds which will be tricky to get beyond 32MHz.. Even so, being able to run internal instructions at superspeed would still be a huge gain, assuming the core can actually run at 32 MHz or faster..
https://www.xilinx.com/products/intelle ... -2871.html
https://www.dcd.pl/workspace/documentat ... 000_ds.pdf
D68000 FPGA core ?
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28350
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
D68000 FPGA core ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
keli
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 22 Aug 2017 13:34
Re: D68000 FPGA core ?
There is also the LGPL licensed TG68 open core. https://opencores.org/project,tg68
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28350
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: D68000 FPGA core ?
I have seen that one, but it does not seem to have been updated in rather a long time ? I do not know if it is actually complete or not either..keli wrote: 20 Nov 2017 19:32 There is also the LGPL licensed TG68 open core. https://opencores.org/project,tg68
-
Smonson
- Posts: 717
- Joined: 28 Oct 2017 10:21
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: D68000 FPGA core ?
Heyyyyy the old BDM cable! That's a blast from the past for me.
-
rpineau
- Posts: 534
- Joined: 17 Aug 2017 18:08
- Location: USA
Re: D68000 FPGA core ?
Yea me too (68332 and early coldfire :) ).
Working ones : MegaSTE (68020) / TT030 / Falcon with AB040 & Eclipse / 1040STF
Need testing : Falcon with CT2
Need testing : Falcon with CT2
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28350
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: D68000 FPGA core ?
No reply :( Anyone else care to see if they can get a reply ?
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28350
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: D68000 FPGA core ?
Emailed from xlinix site as well, still no reply :roll:
Without trying to start another huge debate on this, It's a shame the Apollo guys wasn't more co-operative when we approached them like 2 years ago. They seem to be the only ones doing active CPU clones.
Without trying to start another huge debate on this, It's a shame the Apollo guys wasn't more co-operative when we approached them like 2 years ago. They seem to be the only ones doing active CPU clones.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, Google [Bot] and 1 guest