You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!

exxos IDE interface (untested)

Related information and WIP etc
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27960
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by exxos »

I keep getting asked about adding IDE to my boosters.. well.. This is one circuit I designed months ago.. I just don't have time to build it and test it. If someone wants to build and test it for me.. please do so.. Its the only way IDE will be added as I just don't have the 500 hour days to do everything people want.

ide.JPG

I can't remember much of how I designed it. But I was talking to Esa Sorsa months ago. I tried to emulate better IDE timings as every other IDE solution either doesn't work at all, or has issues with various CF card brands/types. I tried to build in fixes for that and also added in IORDY support (assuming the CF supports it).


Probably this was the initial timings chart I did for it...
fbcbbahj.png
idet.JPG

ide.JPG
Some really good info can be found in this document..

https://www.cpi-tec.jp/cpsd_series/dl/H ... n_V1_1.pdf

Also zipped here..
H_IFD_SI_Specification_V1_1.zip
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Smonson
Posts: 717
Joined: 28 Oct 2017 10:21
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by Smonson »

Is that all you need to do to communicate with an IDE drive? I thought it would be much more complicated than that.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27960
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by exxos »

Smonson wrote: 20 Nov 2017 06:15 Is that all you need to do to communicate with an IDE drive? I thought it would be much more complicated than that.
Other circuits use a lot less parts, which is probably why they don't work so good ;)
User avatar
Icky
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4284
Joined: 03 Sep 2017 10:57
Location: UK

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by Icky »

And we are off.

As discussed with Exxos starting to build this out as basic logic first. Old school logic gates and breadboard fun.

IMG_3363 (2).png

Now on to the second breadboard for the rest of the circuit.

Also to help me break out most of the address and data lines I need for the breadboard instead of having a mess of wires all over the STF Remake board I have a ROM Cart breakout board arriving next week. I will still need to tap a few more lines out from the board as well.

Atari Cart Breakout Board.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7310
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by PhilC »

Cool, looking forward to seeing how you get on.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
Icky
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4284
Joined: 03 Sep 2017 10:57
Location: UK

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by Icky »

Forgottenmyname wrote: 01 Dec 2018 20:40 Cool, looking forward to seeing how you get on.
Thanks - as mentioned by Exxos if we can get it working then we can move it to a PLD
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27960
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by exxos »

Icky wrote: 01 Dec 2018 20:45 Thanks - as mentioned by Exxos if we can get it working then we can move it to a PLD
Looking good! don't forget to tie un-used inputs high or low though!

The schematic is a altera PLD, but I will probably port it to a Atmel device as just a lot easier to deal with.. Hopefully can fit in the SEC booster PLD ultimately.

Good idea for the cartridge port! I guess a prototype could actually be done on a cartridge with the cart RW mod!
User avatar
Icky
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4284
Joined: 03 Sep 2017 10:57
Location: UK

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by Icky »

exxos wrote: 02 Dec 2018 22:04 Looking good! don't forget to tie un-used inputs high or low though!
Indeed I was going to tie them off as the last job on the bread board. Thanks for the reminder :)
exxos wrote: 02 Dec 2018 22:04 The schematic is a altera PLD, but I will probably port it to a Atmel device as just a lot easier to deal with.. Hopefully can fit in the SEC booster PLD ultimately.
Have an Atmel ready and waiting for when we get that far.
exxos wrote: 02 Dec 2018 22:04 Good idea for the cartridge port! I guess a prototype could actually be done on a cartridge with the cart RW mod!
Exactly why I was following your RW cart port thread which I think is a good idea :thumbup: I could see the potential of getting the majority of the lines out via the cart port. I will try the RW option out at the same time.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7310
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by PhilC »

Which atmel pld are you planning to use? I really should start looking at stuff like that, fpgas etc.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27960
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: exxos IDE interface (untested)

Post by exxos »

Forgottenmyname wrote: 02 Dec 2018 22:38 Which atmel pld are you planning to use? I really should start looking at stuff like that, fpgas etc.
ATF1508 mostly. ATF1504 is a bit cheaper but less gates.

Return to “H4 MONGREL EDITION DEVELOPMENT & INFO”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 49 guests