My 1040 STF (motherboard revision: C070523-001 REV.D) shows degraded video quality.
The signal isn't as sharp as my other ST (an STFM) and there's a faint vertical bar pattern visible, most noticeable when on a white background.
The ST has a recapped ASP34-2 PSU so that shouldn't be the problem.
The cable or the monitor can't be the problem since it gives a perfect picture with my STFM.
What part should a look at first to fix this? Could the caps near the left of the monitor connector be causing this?
You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
-
sandord
- Posts: 763
- Joined: 13 Aug 2018 22:08
- Location: The Netherlands
Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28235
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
Most stf machines I have seen seem to suffer from bad video. I think its just a inherent problem on those machines :(
-
sandord
- Posts: 763
- Joined: 13 Aug 2018 22:08
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
Hmm, that's not very promising. Luckily, the other two STFs that I've had on my bench lately were perfectly fine. Any chance that recapping the motherboard will improve things or are you saying that they've probably been bad straight from the factory?exxos wrote: 05 Sep 2018 12:39 Most stf machines I have seen seem to suffer from bad video. I think its just a inherent problem on those machines :(
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28235
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
I've never seen good video on any stf, are they all the same revision of board ?
I think I did look into it ages ago... You could try changing the shifter... I think the only thing which helped was running the shifter direct from a 7805 regulator driven from 12v rail.
I think I did look into it ages ago... You could try changing the shifter... I think the only thing which helped was running the shifter direct from a 7805 regulator driven from 12v rail.
-
sandord
- Posts: 763
- Joined: 13 Aug 2018 22:08
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
C070523-001 REV.D: badexxos wrote: 05 Sep 2018 12:47 I've never seen good video on any stf, are they all the same revision of board ?
CO70789-001 REV. C1: good
C103088 REV. 2.A: good
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28235
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
Ahh yep. Its those silly style boards which be the bad ones.sandord wrote: 05 Sep 2018 12:51
C070523-001 REV.D: bad
CO70789-001 REV. C1: good
C103088 REV. 2.A: good
-
sandord
- Posts: 763
- Joined: 13 Aug 2018 22:08
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
Great, at least I don't have to worry about the other ones going bad.
What is it that makes the C070523-001 REV.D silly again?
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28235
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
Nothing other than me saying its a silly layout really..
The types with CPU at the front are best layouts.. The ones with CPU next to floppy drive are silly :p
But the 0789 types , all the chips are grouped around the PSU connector. On the 0523 the shifter is in between the power and CPU. So noise generated by the CPU gets passed around the shifter area generating noise.
If for arguments sake the shifter was next to the floppy drive and and the CPU in the middle, then noise generated by the shifter wouldn't effect the CPU.
Basically you don't pass higher current paths next to low current ones like the shifter. Shifter is of course sensitive to noise because of the rgb outputs. The CPU is digital and doesn't really care about rgb noise.
Subject can actually get pretty complicated..but really its just bad layout of parts. So I class them as silly. Plus harder to fit boosters as the cou is in a silly place next to the floppy drive..
-
sandord
- Posts: 763
- Joined: 13 Aug 2018 22:08
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
Thanks, that's rather interesting stuff.exxos wrote: 05 Sep 2018 13:11 Nothing other than me saying its a silly layout really..
The types with CPU at the front are best layouts.. The ones with CPU next to floppy drive are silly :p
But the 0789 types , all the chips are grouped around the PSU connector. On the 0523 the shifter is in between the power and CPU. So noise generated by the CPU gets passed around the shifter area generating noise.
If for arguments sake the shifter was next to the floppy drive and and the CPU in the middle, then noise generated by the shifter wouldn't effect the CPU.
Basically you don't pass higher current paths next to low current ones like the shifter. Shifter is of course sensitive to noise because of the rgb outputs. The CPU is digital and doesn't really care about rgb noise.
Subject can actually get pretty complicated..but really its just bad layout of parts. So I class them as silly. Plus harder to fit boosters as the cou is in a silly place next to the floppy drive..
I'm thinking of making the CO70789-001 REV. C1 my favourite motherboard, since it has the best features:
- socketed glue/mmu (better upgrade compatibility)
- not silly so good rgb quality ;-)
- 6 ROM sockets so I can move my 6-chip TOS 1.04 from the silly board over to this one
- blitter solder pads, might fit a socket and a blitter in the future
- non j-leaded rams so better upgrade compatibility
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28235
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Degraded video quality with 1040 STF (C070523-001 REV.D)
The CO70789 type are my favorite styles. Versions without the modulator (STF) are same board, even ones with SMT DRAM, basically same board. So really any similar style board of the CO70789 should be a good one.sandord wrote: 05 Sep 2018 13:19 I'm thinking of making the CO70789-001 REV. C1 my favourite motherboard, since it has the best features:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot, petal [bot], Qwantbot and 69 guests