The TF536 arrives

68030 + SDRAM + IDE

Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator

User avatar
chue
Posts: 72
Joined: 19 Dec 2018 16:46
Location: United States

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by chue »

Perhaps some other component is dodgy, like the power supply or A500 itself?
terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by terriblefire »

I had issues with it initially... Alen uses the pinstrip upside down compared to how I normally solder them (now ... I used to solder them that way round and had connection issues)
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
EzdineG
Posts: 68
Joined: 12 Nov 2018 17:19

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by EzdineG »

terriblefire wrote: 08 Aug 2019 13:21 I had issues with it initially... Alen uses the pinstrip upside down compared to how I normally solder them (now ... I used to solder them that way round and had connection issues)
Can you post a pic of one of yours? I’m a little confused as to what you’re inferring.
terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by terriblefire »

This photo..
3688D703-A0B3-4BC4-90E4-D8C0C0D5CF68.jpeg
The top half of the strip is longer and thinner. I orient it so the fatter bottom pins make contact with the Amiga
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
richx
Posts: 46
Joined: 11 Aug 2019 17:03

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by richx »

Hello! I'm confused as well, on the picture the bottom pins are thinner (meant
for socket) and top pins are fatter (solder side)...
terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by terriblefire »

richx wrote: 11 Aug 2019 17:05 Hello! I'm confused as well, on the picture the bottom pins are thinner (meant
for socket) and top pins are fatter (solder side)...
But it doesnt work if you do that in my experience. The fatter pins fit nicely in turned pin sockets.

I’m not arguing what the manufacturer intended.. I’m just saying it doesn’t work.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7441
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by PhilC »

Worth trying next time I build a board as the small pins are often too loose.

Is it a one shot thing TF? Ie does not damage the socket when inserted?
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by terriblefire »

It’s not going to damage a turned pin socket. It will damage a square pin socket. I usually put a turned pin strip on my relocators.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7441
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by PhilC »

terriblefire wrote: 13 Aug 2019 11:20 It’s not going to damage a turned pin socket. It will damage a square pin socket. I usually put a turned pin strip on my relocators.
Will give it a try next time, thanks.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
alenppc
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 934
Joined: 08 Nov 2018 12:59

Re: The TF536 arrives

Post by alenppc »

I am gonna try soldering it the other way round next time. It just seemed logical to me that one would want longer pins on the bottom, but I guess I was wrong.

Return to “TF536”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 3 guests