I honestly can't see any previous markings either, but it just seemed to come off way too easily with the acetone. I've never had a genuine non-resurfaced CPU have the markings come away that easily before. Maybe just my lack of experience with the ceramic 68030's? More importantly though, it does work at 50MHz.sugar wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:13 pm The image is not a closeup so I'm a bit confused of your findings. If there was no scratches and previous markings I think it's ok that the print comes off with acetone. If you look at the fake for instance in the next post the print has been chemically removed. Perhaps it's just that there is no closeup so I can't see previous markings on the cpu though![]()
Can all registered uses please login, even just for a few minutes..
It helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from..
Thanks :)
It helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from..
Thanks :)
Source of 68030 with MMU?
Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator
Re: Source of 68030 with MMU?
- RogerWilco486
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 6:48 pm
Re: Source of 68030 with MMU?
With these ceramic "RC" chips, the counterfeits are typically lightly media blasted to remove all trace of previous markings, then reprinted.
It really does make them look brand new, but the nice matte finish on the gold cap is a good sign of remarking.
It really does make them look brand new, but the nice matte finish on the gold cap is a good sign of remarking.