@dml
exxos's DFB1 trials
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28344
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
dml
- Posts: 842
- Joined: 15 Nov 2017 22:11
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
success!
d:m:l
BadMooD d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_bm.py
SVO30 d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_svo30.py
Q2 engine d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_q2.py
AGT project: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_agt.py
Atari page: http://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_atari.py
YT: https://www.youtube.com/@dmlTPT
BadMooD d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_bm.py
SVO30 d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_svo30.py
Q2 engine d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_q2.py
AGT project: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_agt.py
Atari page: http://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_atari.py
YT: https://www.youtube.com/@dmlTPT
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28344
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
@Badwolf Going back to what was said yesterday about the thing getting more complicated. Maybe wouldn't be a bad idea just to keep basically the design as you have it now for a "minimal" type of design, and just have the FPU downclocked to 25MHz as standard anyway. Then just not bother.I doubt many people out there would be using the FPU to start with. There may not even bother buying a FPU for it. I think other than the capacitor on the master oscillator it is pretty much production ready I think. At least on my sample set of one :lol:
There the people want a more "advanced board" then have the "exxos edition" ;) which is harder to build but will allow people to experiment more with clock speeds and whatnot. Though I would probably get some birdseed boards done at JLC like I did with the TF536 anyway.
There the people want a more "advanced board" then have the "exxos edition" ;) which is harder to build but will allow people to experiment more with clock speeds and whatnot. Though I would probably get some birdseed boards done at JLC like I did with the TF536 anyway.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28344
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
50MHz OSC in place. it passed all the FPU tests..
BUT..
BUT..
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
dml
- Posts: 842
- Joined: 15 Nov 2017 22:11
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
I noticed from an earlier post that the mandelbox started working after you changed it to load from FastRAM.
Is there something about STRam that is affecting the FPU stability? What happens if you run this same mandelbrot test from FastRAM vs STRam?
d:m:l
BadMooD d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_bm.py
SVO30 d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_svo30.py
Q2 engine d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_q2.py
AGT project: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_agt.py
Atari page: http://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_atari.py
YT: https://www.youtube.com/@dmlTPT
BadMooD d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_bm.py
SVO30 d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_svo30.py
Q2 engine d/l: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_q2.py
AGT project: https://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_agt.py
Atari page: http://www.leonik.net/dml/sec_atari.py
YT: https://www.youtube.com/@dmlTPT
-
Badwolf
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 3043
- Joined: 19 Nov 2019 12:09
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Whilst I agree with all that there's only one minor problem:-exxos wrote: 17 Nov 2022 11:09 @Badwolf Going back to what was said yesterday about the thing getting more complicated. Maybe wouldn't be a bad idea just to keep basically the design as you have it now for a "minimal" type of design, and just have the FPU downclocked to 25MHz as standard anyway. Then just not bother.I doubt many people out there would be using the FPU to start with. There may not even bother buying a FPU for it. I think other than the capacitor on the master oscillator it is pretty much production ready I think. At least on my sample set of one :lol:
That's exactly how your board was set up up here (bar the master osc cap) and your board did not work when it left me.
So unless that master OSC cap is all the difference (and I wasn't using the same oscillator as you -- I was using an osc and an FPU that worked in this board here), we still haven't found out why your board didn't work for me either.
So I still feel like we're *just* missing something.
BW
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28344
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
ah he started working when I added the 33pF onto the clock.. I'm not sure where was ran from had any difference.dml wrote: 17 Nov 2022 11:28 I noticed from an earlier post that the mandelbox started working after you changed it to load from FastRAM.
Is there something about STRam that is affecting the FPU stability? What happens if you run this same mandelbrot test from FastRAM vs STRam?
I just removed the 33pF and now it is failing on those few tests again as it was before...
So I think it seems like the FPU is VERY sensitive to clock issues.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Badwolf
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 3043
- Joined: 19 Nov 2019 12:09
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Shades of BadMood ST-RAM/TT-RAM crossover? That reminds me, I must answer your last question on that thread...dml wrote: 17 Nov 2022 11:28 Is there something about STRam that is affecting the FPU stability? What happens if you run this same mandelbrot test from FastRAM vs STRam?
@exxos, there's a test for your new found working board! viewtopic.php?p=93269#p93269 :lol:
BW
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28344
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Maybe, but when things are borderline like these such things then it is not really a surprise. Your OSC may well work in some boards but not in others. Those boards themselves are not identical so you cannot make the assumption that the OSC is "ok".Badwolf wrote: 17 Nov 2022 11:30 So unless that master OSC cap is all the difference (and I wasn't using the same oscillator as you -- I was using an osc and an FPU that worked in this board here), we still haven't found out why your board didn't work for me either.
So I still feel like we're *just* missing something.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28344
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
I messed around a bit with the 50MHz OSC. But not having much luck. Though with there being noise on the databus and DSACK lines etc, it may be aggravating it enough to not work. Also it is simply possible the FPU may not work at those speeds anyway. Might be worth revisiting 50MHz on a new board re-spin but I don't think it is currently worth spending the time getting those extra few MHz running at this point.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests