TF536 Source Code?

68030 + SDRAM + IDE

Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator

Alex Oughton
Posts: 15
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 23:55

Re: TF536 Source Code?

Post by Alex Oughton »

terriblefire wrote: 11 Dec 2022 21:17 ...If you disable all the fastram then your machine is running at 7Mhz. So adding the 030 is pointless.
Not the worst thing if your motivation is similar to mine. What I was trying to achieve with the physical boot switch is to have the machine "modernized" in one mode with the newer OS and other upgrades, and "how it was when I bought it from that nice old lady" in the other mode. They didn't have any on-accelerator RAM installed when they were using it, so it's pretty much back to what I was aiming for in this mode.

Just to experiment, I've tried manually enabling the RAM post-boot now that I'm using the updated TF536 firmware. There's some reproducible "strange behavior" which I still experience here (identical to when I was using my own tool for the SHUTUP). For example, if I start SysInfo and hold down the mouse button on the top-left scroll bar, the hard disk starts clicking as if it's reading or writing something. It will keep clicking until the mouse button is released. This is alarming to me, and seems to me like something going wrong with DMA, like the SCSI card is responding to the wrong memory address. I haven't been able to reproduce this when the RAM is disabled.

That said though, this Xetec SCSI card is a strange beast. It's quite an early card with very old firmware, and I have to disable caches even when running it on 3.2 to prevent disk corruption. The DMA just seems... problematic. So other people might not experience this issue, but I'm definitely keeping the RAM off in my case under 1.3.
terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: TF536 Source Code?

Post by terriblefire »

Alex Oughton wrote: 11 Dec 2022 22:22
terriblefire wrote: 11 Dec 2022 21:17 ...If you disable all the fastram then your machine is running at 7Mhz. So adding the 030 is pointless.
That said though, this Xetec SCSI card is a strange beast. It's quite an early card with very old firmware, and I have to disable caches even when running it on 3.2 to prevent disk corruption. The DMA just seems... problematic. So other people might not experience this issue, but I'm definitely keeping the RAM off in my case under 1.3.
OK but it confuses me why you would even want to put a TF536 in a machine if its going to run at the same or almost the same speed as a stock 68K. Wouldnt you be better just using the plain 68K and avoiding all headaches?
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
Alex Oughton
Posts: 15
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 23:55

Re: TF536 Source Code?

Post by Alex Oughton »

terriblefire wrote: 12 Dec 2022 08:22 OK but it confuses me why you would even want to put a TF536 in a machine if its going to run at the same or almost the same speed as a stock 68K. Wouldnt you be better just using the plain 68K and avoiding all headaches?
Because most of the time I run under 3.2 with everything enabled. 1.3 is a distant secondary option.
erique
Posts: 10
Joined: 11 Nov 2021 22:40

Re: TF536 Source Code?

Post by erique »

Alex Oughton wrote: 12 Dec 2022 11:27 Because most of the time I run under 3.2 with everything enabled.
Except caches then, as those caused the disk corruption?
Alex Oughton
Posts: 15
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 23:55

Re: TF536 Source Code?

Post by Alex Oughton »

erique wrote: 12 Dec 2022 18:18 Except caches then, as those caused the disk corruption?
Right, yes. I use

Code: Select all

setpatch nocache
in my startup-sequence under 3.2 and all is well.

Return to “TF536”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, OAI-Search [Bot] and 3 guests