Welcome to the world of Atari :lol:Smonson wrote: 31 Aug 2018 10:54 No worries! I hope it's nothing serious, my track record so far isn't looking good otherwise :lol:
Cool.. will do that as well...

Welcome to the world of Atari :lol:Smonson wrote: 31 Aug 2018 10:54 No worries! I hope it's nothing serious, my track record so far isn't looking good otherwise :lol:
Cool.. will do that as well...



Not yet.. Not been running very long anyway..


Probably one of those times just to put your scope on all the clock pins one by one.. if it crashes when you touch one clock, then that signal is over sensitive.. Loading of the scope can also help clean up noise on clocks.. so scope on one line may solve the problem.. assuming its clock noise that is.troed wrote: 31 Aug 2018 19:25 I clock _it_ from my GAL (and the GAL also clocks everything else). So my resets are caused by something else.
Well, it's rock solid with the original Shifter - so it's at least something that somehow gets affected by the FPGA. But I also have resets (less often) using only the FPGA exactly like you are, without my GAL.exxos wrote: 31 Aug 2018 19:36 Probably one of those times just to put your scope on all the clock pins one by one.. if it crashes when you touch one clock, then that signal is over sensitive.. Loading of the scope can also help clean up noise on clocks.. so scope on one line may solve the problem.. assuming its clock noise that is.

Does anything change with the clocks at all from the shifter being inserted to the FPGA board ? Does any clock lines get different loads between shifter vs FPGA ( I don't really know how its all hooked up in your machine or how the FPGA clocks are working )troed wrote: 31 Aug 2018 19:44 Well, it's rock solid with the original Shifter - so it's at least something that somehow gets affected by the FPGA. But I also have resets (less often) using only the FPGA exactly like you are, without my GAL.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 7 guests