Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Share your building progress here!
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28348
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by exxos »

Are thoser 2 resistors next to the 1772 1k or 470R ?

Edit:

Sounds like the problem I had when the side0 thing wasn't done https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... =30#p52087

Or did you solder the lugs on the db19 as it could short out the side0 select I guess :shrug: either way, it sounds like the same problem.
Steve
Posts: 3305
Joined: 15 Sep 2017 11:49

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by Steve »

Both resistors are 470ohm, lugs on DB19, the ACSI port? My lugs *are* soldered... should I de-solder them? Sorry I missed this
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28348
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by exxos »

Steve wrote: 19 Jan 2022 21:51 My lugs *are* soldered... should I de-solder them? Sorry I missed this
I would meter out that side0 line, Sounds like it is shorted to gnd (I assume the solder filled the hole completely and shorted the lug to the exposed internal trace) .

You may want to scope out the behaviour of that signal on a working machine then to your problem board so you can see what the differences. I assume side zero is the problem.
Steve
Posts: 3305
Joined: 15 Sep 2017 11:49

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by Steve »

@exxos thank you my friend, it was exactly as you said. I only put a touch of solder on that lug but yes it had re-grounded my previously cut track in that db19 hole. I pulled out my Dremel and filed away all the gold on the inside of the lug hole and then the continuity was broken again (as it should be) just tested and now my H5 is 100% for the first time :) finally I can start playing with it and having some fun :)

Thx again,

PXL_20220120_113205577.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Steve
Posts: 3305
Joined: 15 Sep 2017 11:49

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by Steve »

PS does Blitter become disabled in 030 mode? I just noticed it's greyed out with the tf536 in. Emutos 1.1.1.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7441
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by PhilC »

:cheer: :cheer: :cheer:
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
DoG
Posts: 1298
Joined: 07 Apr 2018 12:26

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by DoG »

Blitter is pretty pointless when 68030 is running in 50MHz (over 32MHz) anyway. Since it outperform the blitter in those speeds.
Steve
Posts: 3305
Joined: 15 Sep 2017 11:49

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by Steve »

Ah yes, I checked in sysinfo and it says 'Blitter available and off'.
User avatar
JezC
Posts: 2783
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 23:44

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by JezC »

Well done @Steve !

This might provoke me to investigate and fix the floppy drive issue on my H5 C...

I'll be interested to see how you get on with your TF536...I still need to update the f/w in mine to enable the IDE ...
User avatar
Badwolf
Site sponsor
Site sponsor
Posts: 3043
Joined: 19 Nov 2019 12:09

Re: Steve's H5 A3.14 Build (Chicken Pie edition)

Post by Badwolf »

Steve wrote: 20 Jan 2022 11:37 PS does Blitter become disabled in 030 mode? I just noticed it's greyed out with the tf536 in. Emutos 1.1.1.
EmuTOS turns off the blitter if it detects Alt (TT) RAM as the two don't mix.
DoG wrote: 20 Jan 2022 11:41 Blitter is pretty pointless when 68030 is running in 50MHz (over 32MHz) anyway. Since it outperform the blitter in those speeds.
I've seen this said a lot and I'm not convinced this is true.

I think this myth came about from the TT not having a blitter. 'Ah, at that speed it doesn't need it'. True, but the TT could access ST-RAM twice as fast as an ST.

With an accelerated ST, whatever the CPU speed, it can only access ST-RAM (ie. the same places the blitter can access) at the same speed as a 68000 at 8MHz can. Therefore wherever the blitter gave a benefit to an 8MHz 68000, it should give the same benefit to an 'n' MHz 68030 on the same motherboard.

In fact, for TOS2.06, I believe Anders has made a program ('blitfix') that selectively enables the blitter when it's possible to use it. Sadly it can't work on the Falcon because of a limitation in TOS, but it would be interesting to see figures with and without it on an ST/536.

BW
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark

Return to “H5 A3 USER BUILDS”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests