TT VME Graphics - Revisited

The latest tweaks and fixes to keep your machine running in tip-top shape.
Atarian Computing
Posts: 581
Joined: 22 Aug 2017 04:27

TT VME Graphics - Revisited

Post by Atarian Computing »

Copied from my blog:TT VME Graphics - Revisited

Just recently I posted the article TT VME Bus Fix - Does it really make it faster? where I compared performance before and after Atari's VME Bus Fix which all REV.H motherboards and up seem to have. As kind of expected, the gains were not significant. I mean we would have noticed this years ago. What is unexpected, however, is the sudden performance boost (on average) than just a few days ago. So what has changed? Am I missing something? If so, let me know.

Before I show the results, here's what has changed (I'll list everything even if it is seemingly unrelated):
  • Motherboard recapped
    Rest of the rework done (My TT Gets Some Love)
    New storage (TT Cable Management and Cooling - Extreme Edition)
    New HDDriver version 10.12
    Lightning USB installed and drivers loaded
    New GAL and hardware mod to Nova as per Lightning installation.
    Fresh NVDI 5.03 installation with Nova option. (SYS files disabled as before).
    New English version of menu.prg
Not changed:
  • NVDI version
    Gembench version
    Nova drivers apart from menu.prg
    Test OS TOS 3.06 Thunder&Lightning edition
Here is a comparison in 1280x1024x256 against exact same reference. The difference is staggering but not all are gains if you look closely.
TT Before & After 1280x1024x256.jpg
And here is 1024x768x65536. Same story. Hard to believe that 16bit color at this resolution is almost as fast as TT-High.
TT Before & After 1024x768x65536.jpg
So how much faster is Mach64 to the ET4000? I happen to have both. The reference is before all fixes so keep that in mind. Also that test was done without NVDI so to be fair I tested without it now as well. Resolution is at 1024x768x256. Pretty crazy.
Mach64 vs ET4000.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28344
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TT VME Graphics - Revisited

Post by exxos »

Looking at your first two screenshots, it looks like the blitter is running a few percent faster ? Which will up the scores on a lot of things...
Atarian Computing
Posts: 581
Joined: 22 Aug 2017 04:27

Re: TT VME Graphics - Revisited

Post by Atarian Computing »

exxos wrote: 27 Jul 2018 11:08 Looking at your first two screenshots, it looks like the blitter is running a few percent faster ? Which will up the scores on a lot of things...
It's actually the other way. I guess I should have named the files "After & Before". So despite the blitter actually being slower, my rig is significantly faster than before.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28344
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TT VME Graphics - Revisited

Post by exxos »

Atarian Computing wrote: 27 Jul 2018 11:23 It's actually the other way. I guess I should have named the files "After & Before". So despite the blitter actually being slower, my rig is significantly faster than before.
Odd... maybe its the caches screwing things up ?
User avatar
Cyprian
Posts: 542
Joined: 22 Dec 2017 09:16
Location: Warszawa, Poland

Re: TT VME Graphics - Revisited

Post by Cyprian »

there is no the BLiTTER in the TT
ATW800/2 / V4sa / Lynx I / Mega ST 1 / 7800 / Portfolio / Lynx II / Jaguar / TT030 / Mega STe / 800 XL / 1040 STe / Falcon030 / 65 XE / 520 STm / SM124 / SC1435
DDD HDD / AT Speed C16 / TF536 / SDrive / PAK68/3 / Lynx Multi Card / LDW Super 2000 / XCA12 / SkunkBoard / CosmosEx / SatanDisk / UltraSatan / USB Floppy Drive Emulator / Eiffel / SIO2PC / Crazy Dots / PAM Net
http://260ste.atari.org

Return to “TWEAKS & FIXES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest