TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!

Other boosters or variants.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28363
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!

Post by exxos »

Steve wrote: 23 Feb 2021 15:14 I've always tested against 'DEFAULT' assuming others probably would/should do the same. I think there are only two logical test methods: current system vs stock same system & current system vs gembench default.
If you mean the DEFAULT GB6 setting.. that can vary between versions as well.. But I guess in future releases I will make sure DEFAULT is TOS206 STE or something. it may prevent some confusion with how it works..
User avatar
DoG
Posts: 1298
Joined: 07 Apr 2018 12:26

Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!

Post by DoG »

I usually test against STFM1048 file. That is normal ST without blitter, TOS 1.04. Default on my copy is a STe with TOS 2.06.
User avatar
Badwolf
Site sponsor
Site sponsor
Posts: 3043
Joined: 19 Nov 2019 12:09

Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!

Post by Badwolf »

frank.lukas wrote: 23 Feb 2021 14:44 ... to compare with a 25 years old hardware design

PAK68/3-030 - 50Mhz with 64MB Fastram

P030_ST.jpg

P030_TT.jpg
Very cool, thanks. Just shows the hardware may have got cheaper but it’s going to produce the same results with the same basic assumptions. TF’s just a smidge quicker on the AltRAM than PAK and I’ve still got to shave 20% off somewhere!

Cheers,

BW.
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark

Return to “EVERYTHING ELSE”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 3 guests