Ah there we go :thumbup: , running them twice from AUTO has made GB6 happy, it now finds and runs in alt-ram!
So here are the updated results..
I've dumped my .ST image here while its working :lol:
So it runs FASTRAM.PRG then TTRAMTOS from AUTO.. Resets... Loads again (but second run of TTRAMTOS doesn't load the IMG or causes reset now) then I have BLITFIX.PRG on AUTO in NEWDESK.INF.
:dizzy: :thanksyellow: :girldance:
REMINDER - Stay logged in for at least 2 hours a week to get whitelisted.
Also it helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from for detection scripts.
:o)
Also it helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from for detection scripts.
:o)
Atari + gotek + MAPROM floppy corruption
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28601
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Atari + gotek + MAPROM floppy corruption
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28601
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Atari + gotek + MAPROM floppy corruption
With caches off..
But with ROM access so fast, the scores should be wayyyy higher... :shrug:
This is my 32MHz booster, no alt-ram.. So the 030 should be more like double all those scores at 50Mhz.
But with ROM access so fast, the scores should be wayyyy higher... :shrug:
This is my 32MHz booster, no alt-ram.. So the 030 should be more like double all those scores at 50Mhz.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
agranlund
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: 18 Aug 2019 22:43
- Location: Sweden
Re: Atari + gotek + MAPROM floppy corruption
This is my 534.
Granted, it's comparing against a stock ST because that's where I started and I'm interested in my score against that.
It's also running NVDI. I'll try without NVDI tomorrow and see what that shows.
I think this is EmuTOS. TOS206 is slightly faster at some tests and slightly slower at others but average is >1000% on both :)
TOS is doing a lot of ST-RAM access drawing so NVDI and fastram is a very good match.
And in your case without maprom all of TOS internal variables are in ST-RAM as well which isn't going to help.
Edit: I am curious about some of these faster results on the 32Mhz booster though, is the ST bus also boosted or is it still running at 8Mhz?
Granted, it's comparing against a stock ST because that's where I started and I'm interested in my score against that.
It's also running NVDI. I'll try without NVDI tomorrow and see what that shows.
I think this is EmuTOS. TOS206 is slightly faster at some tests and slightly slower at others but average is >1000% on both :)
TOS is doing a lot of ST-RAM access drawing so NVDI and fastram is a very good match.
And in your case without maprom all of TOS internal variables are in ST-RAM as well which isn't going to help.
Edit: I am curious about some of these faster results on the 32Mhz booster though, is the ST bus also boosted or is it still running at 8Mhz?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 4 guests