REMINDER - Stay logged in for at least 2 hours a week to get whitelisted.
Also it helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from for detection scripts.
:o)

dml attempts a Raven

User avatar
dml
Posts: 853
Joined: 15 Nov 2017 22:11

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by dml »

I think this is as far as I should sensibly go until the missing IC and dip sockets show up next week.

I'll probably do those first with the last crystals etc, then the resistor networks and then all the connectors/sockets, with pin-headers last so there is less chance of getting pins bent while turning the board over.

Note the size of that cooler & SIMM socket 0 :p close, but not quite!
progress2.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
agranlund
Site sponsor
Site sponsor
Posts: 1763
Joined: 18 Aug 2019 22:43
Location: Sweden

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by agranlund »

dml wrote: 08 Jun 2025 13:13 Note the size of that cooler & SIMM socket 0 :p close, but not quite!
Oh.. so close but not quite a perfect fit! You could probably cut a little bit off it with a bandsaw :)

I recon there would have been just enough space for the cooler if the simm sockets sat more snug next to each other - they don't necessarily need that much space between them.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7494
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by PhilC »

Fitting 45 degree angled Simm sockets might help?
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
dml
Posts: 853
Joined: 15 Nov 2017 22:11

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by dml »

If I could find someone with an end-mill, I could maybe lengthen the CPU indent/channel under the cooler and move it 4mm horizontally out of the way. But that's a big 'if'. I'll leave it alone for now. :)

Meanwhile, the missing IC and the DIP sockets turned up so I should in theory be able to finish building the main board very soon...

BTW some of the ICs so far had no indication at all for pin 1, except the orientation of the writing. No dot, no groove, no line. Nothing, top or bottom. So the probability I have at least one in backwards is ... > 0.0
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7494
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by PhilC »

@dml join the club with fitting stuff backwards :lol:
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
sety
Posts: 224
Joined: 13 Aug 2018 08:47

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by sety »

dml wrote: 11 Jun 2025 18:46 BTW some of the ICs so far had no indication at all for pin 1, except the orientation of the writing. No dot, no groove, no line. Nothing, top or bottom. So the probability I have at least one in backwards is ... > 0.0
KiCad pin 1 marking is not very clear but it is there. Sometimes it is a line, a square with a missing corner or the said missing corner!

You can also switch on pin 1 marking in the interactive BOM which is helpful. :)
User avatar
dml
Posts: 853
Joined: 15 Nov 2017 22:11

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by dml »

sety wrote: 12 Jun 2025 02:10 KiCad pin 1 marking is not very clear but it is there. Sometimes it is a line, a square with a missing corner or the said missing corner!

You can also switch on pin 1 marking in the interactive BOM which is helpful. :)
Oh - I meant the components themselves, not the board. I found the board a little cryptic in places but the marking is aways there in some form :)

On closer inspecting one of those ICs under microscope though, I did find a marking in a place I didn't notice before - not on the top or bottom of the package but a very tiny indent/notch on the side of the package, just above the pin shoulder.

Surfacemount component MFRs are getting very economical with the human-readable information, even when there's space for it :)
sety
Posts: 224
Joined: 13 Aug 2018 08:47

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by sety »

dml wrote: 12 Jun 2025 08:24
Oh - I meant the components themselves, not the board. I found the board a little cryptic in places but the marking is aways there in some form :)

On closer inspecting one of those ICs under microscope though, I did find a marking in a place I didn't notice before - not on the top or bottom of the package but a very tiny indent/notch on the side of the package, just above the pin shoulder.

Surfacemount component MFRs are getting very economical with the human-readable information, even when there's space for it :)
Oh yeah! The industrial world is now using pick and place machines. Markings are obsolete, which doesn't help the home builder much. Caps are the worst. Put a strip of them in to the wrong container and the whole lot is a write off :lol:

A Poska pen can help. give the IC a dab of paint and wipe it off with your finger, if there is a pin 1 indent, it will show up good.
User avatar
dml
Posts: 853
Joined: 15 Nov 2017 22:11

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by dml »

sety wrote: 12 Jun 2025 09:56 Markings are obsolete, which doesn't help the home builder much. Caps are the worst. Put a strip of them in to the wrong container and the whole lot is a write off :lol:
A couple of times I did that - I solved it by poking sharp probes through the film with a capacitance meter. But then its difficult to find space to write the value on the back of the strip as its mostly made of holes.
sety wrote: 12 Jun 2025 09:56 A Poska pen can help. give the IC a dab of paint and wipe it off with your finger, if there is a pin 1 indent, it will show up good.
Good tip!
User avatar
dml
Posts: 853
Joined: 15 Nov 2017 22:11

Re: dml attempts a Raven

Post by dml »

I think I have assembled enough of this to start thinking about some basic tests - checking for shorts on rails, making sure +5/12v isn't appearing on the wrong pins etc... maybe some tests with power applied. And then move towards programming the ICs.

to-test.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Return to “RAVEN 060 - USER BUILDS”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Awario [Bot], ClaudeBot and 6 guests