PCB only is quickest to market. As MW modules are hard and expensive to source in the uk, people buy their own.
Or Meanwell modules pre-fitted.
Or rehash the current PSU design. Not using a transformer but 12v module front end. 5v and 3.3v get their own exxos regulation circuits where voltages can be adjusted. This would likely be the most expensive and time consuming method.
Obviously there needs to be enough demand to make them worthwhile the time and costs.
Can all registered uses please login, even just for a few minutes..
It helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from..
Thanks :)
It helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from..
Thanks :)
Should exxos design a new CT60 PSU?
Re: Should exxos design a new CT60 PSU?
I don't really care about how / what is it made from, as an end user I'd appreciate:
- easy fitting (no drilling holes, ideally using the existing ones the switch etc)
- no collision with ct60, ct63, ct60e + peripherals (ctpci, ethernat, supervidel -- taking some space on the right side)
- working for both 030 and 060
- easy fitting (no drilling holes, ideally using the existing ones the switch etc)
- no collision with ct60, ct63, ct60e + peripherals (ctpci, ethernat, supervidel -- taking some space on the right side)
- working for both 030 and 060
Re: Should exxos design a new CT60 PSU?
Yeah and in my experience I think most people would like something fully built and ready to go, if people have to source power modules or do their own soldering I think it'd reduce your sales quite significantly.
Re: Should exxos design a new CT60 PSU?
I would want something fully assembled and tested.
What I liked about the CT60PSU was it's fitting. It fitted perfectly.
All the cables were the correct length.
The 3D printed plastics meant it looked stock. Plus the speaker carrier was very cool if like me you wanted it to keep it as close to stock as possible.
I'd really like (and there's no reason why not) any replacement to be similar. (Easy to install, good fit, stock look externally)
The PicoPSU that I had previously was a fudge and I never liked it. I really didn't like the external AC/DC laptop PSU.
What I liked about the CT60PSU was it's fitting. It fitted perfectly.
All the cables were the correct length.
The 3D printed plastics meant it looked stock. Plus the speaker carrier was very cool if like me you wanted it to keep it as close to stock as possible.
I'd really like (and there's no reason why not) any replacement to be similar. (Easy to install, good fit, stock look externally)
The PicoPSU that I had previously was a fudge and I never liked it. I really didn't like the external AC/DC laptop PSU.
Senior Principal ASIC Engineer - SystemVerilog, VHDL
Thalion Webshrine - http://thalion.atari.org
ST,STf,STfm,STe,MegaST,MegaSTe,Falcon060
A500+,A600,A4000/060,CD32,CDTV
Thalion Webshrine - http://thalion.atari.org
ST,STf,STfm,STe,MegaST,MegaSTe,Falcon060
A500+,A600,A4000/060,CD32,CDTV
Re: Should exxos design a new CT60 PSU?
I'm all for easy install. But things like connectors on mains I draw the line at. Having worked on various electronics and electromechanical equipment, failures were, for the most part, always connectors.
So there's the problem.. People want plug and play and go with such solutions over mine because my stuff needs soldering. People see quick and simple as better, when in my experience, it's not.
Take for example enclosed fuse holders. I've seen so many melt into a blob.. Constant use, a bit of heat builds up, contacts tend to ark even a tiny bit. Starts to heat up the fuse and holder.. 6 months later it's not even recognisable as a fuse holder anymore..
So there's the problem.. People want plug and play and go with such solutions over mine because my stuff needs soldering. People see quick and simple as better, when in my experience, it's not.
Take for example enclosed fuse holders. I've seen so many melt into a blob.. Constant use, a bit of heat builds up, contacts tend to ark even a tiny bit. Starts to heat up the fuse and holder.. 6 months later it's not even recognisable as a fuse holder anymore..
Re: Should exxos design a new CT60 PSU?
That is not the case here. You didn't sell anything in this space. If you had, then I would have considered / favoured it given my previous positive experience with Exxos products.exxos wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2026 4:02 pm So there's the problem.. People want plug and play and go with such solutions over mine because my stuff needs soldering. People see quick and simple as better, when in my experience, it's not.
If vendors ignore their customers requirements then they go elsewhere.
If customers ignore vendors recommendations they get an inferior experience.
There is no need for soldering on this item (though I appreciate it was in reference to other products)
Senior Principal ASIC Engineer - SystemVerilog, VHDL
Thalion Webshrine - http://thalion.atari.org
ST,STf,STfm,STe,MegaST,MegaSTe,Falcon060
A500+,A600,A4000/060,CD32,CDTV
Thalion Webshrine - http://thalion.atari.org
ST,STf,STfm,STe,MegaST,MegaSTe,Falcon060
A500+,A600,A4000/060,CD32,CDTV
Re: Should exxos design a new CT60 PSU?
Just to clarify, that comment wasn't aimed at this market specifically, it was a general observation about how people buy things. Quick and simple usually wins over doing it properly, that's just human nature, nothing against you or anyone else here.alexh wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2026 8:30 pm That is not the case here. You didn't sell anything in this space. If you had, then I would have considered / favoured it given my previous positive experience with Exxos products.
If vendors ignore their customers requirements then they go elsewhere.
If customers ignore vendors recommendations they get an inferior experience.
There is no need for soldering on this item (though I appreciate it was in reference to other products
I do get why people want plug and play, and they'll always favour it given the choice. But wanting it doesn't make it the right call. I've got years of experience behind me and plenty of failures most people will never see, and that experience tells me routing mains through the same switch as a low voltage signal is asking for trouble. I'm not going to design something I already know is likely to fail that way just because it's more convenient. If someone wants to skip that and go for the quick option anyway, that's their choice to make, but it's not one I'll build towards.
On "no need for soldering", that one doesn't really hold up for me. The connectors, switches and everything else on these boards still have to be wired, they just arrive already soldered for you. Needing soldering versus not needing it isn't really the distinction, it's where that connection sits. Even pre-wired, there's still a connector sat on the mains side, and that's the bit I wouldn't do regardless, connectors fail. Give me a choice and I'll solder the wires straight onto the power supply board rather than put a connector there, but each to their own.
Soldering has always been part and parcel of retro computing. If someone's expecting pure plug and play with zero risk and zero effort, they're probably in the wrong hobby.


