@Badwolf
I grabbed your flash tool from your github. Though it seems to crash when says erasing flash ?
I had to use the jumper link on the board to disable the flash to allow me to boot, so I assume that is the correct way of going about it ? and it doesn't actually disable the flash from being erased as well ?
EDIT:
OK so it seems use the DISABLE jumper then use the flash tool :lol:
Needs error checking for idiots which do it as I did originally ;)
REMINDER - Stay logged in for at least 2 hours a week to get whitelisted.
Also it helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from for detection scripts.
:o)
Also it helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from for detection scripts.
:o)
exxos's DFB1 trials
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28404
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28404
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Now running from flash :D
So let me do some mathematical guesswork here...
STE booster 368% at 32MHz.
368% / 2 = 184% (16MHz)
FALCON 100% at 16MHz.
Now 176%.
So pretty close I guess. Though the flash is 70ns not 55ns like on the STE booster.
327% (based against 8MHz STE) ROM Speed with CPU cache.
268% (based against 8MHz STE) ROM Speed without CPU cache
I guess working it out per clock cycle at 50MHz = 20ns
1 clock ) 20 ns
2 clock ) 40 ns
3 clock ) 60 ns
4 clock ) 80 ns
I think BW has it set to "4" so I guess 3 might work as it probably takes the CPU a cycle to latch the data anyway :shrug:
Lets try it anyway.. :lol: :fire: :hide: :fire:
Computer says... "M" :lol:
So let me do some mathematical guesswork here...
STE booster 368% at 32MHz.
368% / 2 = 184% (16MHz)
FALCON 100% at 16MHz.
Now 176%.
So pretty close I guess. Though the flash is 70ns not 55ns like on the STE booster.
327% (based against 8MHz STE) ROM Speed with CPU cache.
268% (based against 8MHz STE) ROM Speed without CPU cache
I guess working it out per clock cycle at 50MHz = 20ns
1 clock ) 20 ns
2 clock ) 40 ns
3 clock ) 60 ns
4 clock ) 80 ns
I think BW has it set to "4" so I guess 3 might work as it probably takes the CPU a cycle to latch the data anyway :shrug:
Lets try it anyway.. :lol: :fire: :hide: :fire:
Computer says... "M" :lol:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28404
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
50MHz with MAPROM :)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
stephen_usher
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 7391
- Joined: 13 Nov 2017 19:19
- Location: Oxford, UK.
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
It's just thinking about it. It didn't say "No" :lol:
Intro retro computers since before they were retro...
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28404
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Next problem is that MAPROM doesn't seem to like being loaded from AUTO :shrug:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28404
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Next with NVDI. Though I had to load NVDI first and then MAPROM from desktop. So I assume NVDI is running from ST RAM not alt-ram :shrug:
I think my monitor might be dying as it keeps losing sync :(
So this is with AUTO booted older version of MAPROM & NVDI.
I think my monitor might be dying as it keeps losing sync :(
So this is with AUTO booted older version of MAPROM & NVDI.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
stephen_usher
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 7391
- Joined: 13 Nov 2017 19:19
- Location: Oxford, UK.
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
That's all looking very promising.
Of course it's the demos which trip things up as they push the system to the limit. I seem to remember that they were what showed up incompatibilities on the original board.
Of course it's the demos which trip things up as they push the system to the limit. I seem to remember that they were what showed up incompatibilities on the original board.
Intro retro computers since before they were retro...
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28404
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
I think BadMood might be a good test. But I haven't been able to get my SD card to work on my PC and Falcon. So I am stuck with floppies for transferring data over :roll:stephen_usher wrote: 20 Jun 2023 20:29 That's all looking very promising.
Of course it's the demos which trip things up as they push the system to the limit. I seem to remember that they were what showed up incompatibilities on the original board.
Of course if there is any demos which will fit on a floppy I will gladly give them a try. But if there are problems, its likely going to be beyond my scope of diagnosing such problems. Currently it will pass FPU, GB6, YAARTTT perfectly well. That's about all I can do here. As far as I concerned it is a lot more stable than the original and basically just have to get them tested and in store now really.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28404
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Just hit 100 passes on GB6. It's been running GB6 with alt-ram and NVDI just fine. All at 50MHz CPU & FPU. Seems stable to me 8-)
-
Atari74user
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 13 Jan 2018 21:19
Re: exxos's DFB1 trials
Encouraging, good work! :dualthumbup:
AtariTOSser
Medusa Hades 060 512mb, ET4000 / MACH64 | Atari Falcon 14mb, 68882, 8gb CF, Steinberg FDI, FA8, GigaFile & CT60e | Atari Jaguar, GD, Skunkboard & Cat Box | Atari 520STFM 4mb, Exxos Booster, TOS switcher, OverScan, UltraSatan, PARCP-USB, Unicorn-USB, ICD Link 2, ADAP, ADAP II, Lynex, ADAS-ST, SoundPool MO4, Steinberg MIDEX, SMPII, Emagic Log 3, C-Lab Unitor 2, Combiner & ExPort...
Medusa Hades 060 512mb, ET4000 / MACH64 | Atari Falcon 14mb, 68882, 8gb CF, Steinberg FDI, FA8, GigaFile & CT60e | Atari Jaguar, GD, Skunkboard & Cat Box | Atari 520STFM 4mb, Exxos Booster, TOS switcher, OverScan, UltraSatan, PARCP-USB, Unicorn-USB, ICD Link 2, ADAP, ADAP II, Lynex, ADAS-ST, SoundPool MO4, Steinberg MIDEX, SMPII, Emagic Log 3, C-Lab Unitor 2, Combiner & ExPort...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests