ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Related information and WIP etc
User avatar
rubber_jonnie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 14893
Joined: 17 Aug 2017 19:40
Location: Essex

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by rubber_jonnie »

This arrived in the post today from Uwe:
IMG_20190503_153822.jpg
So I'll be taking it away with me when I go away for the next few days, and fingers crossed I will return knowledgeable :)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Collector of many retro things!
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
User avatar
Icky
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4375
Joined: 03 Sep 2017 10:57
Location: UK

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by Icky »

rubber_jonnie wrote: 04 May 2019 00:05 This arrived in the post today from Uwe:

So I'll be taking it away with me when I go away for the next few days, and fingers crossed I will return knowledgeable :)
So after your trip you will be known as the exxos forum HDDriver expert. :)
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28360
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by exxos »

rubber_jonnie wrote: 04 May 2019 00:05 So I'll be taking it away with me when I go away for the next few days, and fingers crossed I will return knowledgeable :)
:cheer: :bravo:
User avatar
rubber_jonnie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 14893
Joined: 17 Aug 2017 19:40
Location: Essex

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by rubber_jonnie »

Icky wrote: 04 May 2019 00:07
rubber_jonnie wrote: 04 May 2019 00:05 This arrived in the post today from Uwe:

So I'll be taking it away with me when I go away for the next few days, and fingers crossed I will return knowledgeable :)
So after your trip you will be known as the exxos forum HDDriver expert. :)
Yeah, probably, that kind of thing happens to me a lot. I did a bit of stuff on Docker at work, now I'm the expert. Who knew?
Collector of many retro things!
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7442
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PhilC »

Sounds familiar..... I'm the expert in many things at work due to being the only one who dare look at it.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
rubber_jonnie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 14893
Joined: 17 Aug 2017 19:40
Location: Essex

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by rubber_jonnie »

Well, I just won the IDE ZIP drive I was bidding on, so more experimentation to come. Need to try a CDROM drive too, see what pops up 😁
Collector of many retro things!
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
User avatar
PaulJ
Posts: 1568
Joined: 08 Apr 2018 01:14
Location: USA

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PaulJ »

Ok, my patience has been tested by IDE2.PRG beyond its breaking point. So I've been wanting to give Lattice C a test run so I have generated another Mass Storage Punisher. I have been running it on Hatari and it is significantly faster than IDE2. It also writes out a 50 mb file, reads it back and checks it. You can also instruct it to run multiple iterations by using -r<number of runs>. Also by default it removes the created test file but if you enter -k it will retain the last file created. So if you command it to run 10 times it will keep the 50 mb data file keep on the 10th or last pass. Also it quits looking for errors after 512 have been found in an iteration. This number cane changed via -e<max # errors per iteration>. There is a -b option that doesn't do anything yet. It will control the number of 4096 byte blocks that constitute a test. It is currently set to 12287 which gives you a test file of 12287 x 4096 or ~50mb. Anyway Phil its another tool you can use to break something quicker. :) :) :)

OPT.jpg
MS2.jpg
MS4.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
PaulJ
Posts: 1568
Joined: 08 Apr 2018 01:14
Location: USA

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PaulJ »

Ok, to slow to figure out how to attach a TTP file. How does one attach an executable?
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28360
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by exxos »

You have to zip it to upload files..

BTW, there already is a faster ide test program somewhere which Samson did.. But it didn't detect the errors as good as mine, even though its the same test, just faster., i think it took like 10mins to run instead of 2 hours..

So in using other testing tools, your not actually doing tests which have been proven to work...its not just about how fast the drive can be tested, its about bus stability over the hours its running.. So in speeding up the drive testing, your actually skipping half the test.

There are no shortcuts for this, if there was, we be doing them already ;)
User avatar
PaulJ
Posts: 1568
Joined: 08 Apr 2018 01:14
Location: USA

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PaulJ »

Not sure about all of that, its been my experience that a lot of things work flawlessly when running slowly but tend to show errors when pushed a little harder. Since I have this patience thing I'll use mine and you can use yours and we will all be happy. :) :) :) I did get to check out lattice C which appears to pretty good for its age. Its noticeably faster than MWC which did surprise me.. :o :o :o

Return to “H4 MONGREL EDITION DEVELOPMENT & INFO”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 5 guests