TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

68030 + SDRAM + IDE

Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator

terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by terriblefire »

arkadiusz.makarenko wrote: 15 Sep 2021 14:42
terriblefire wrote: 15 Sep 2021 10:34 There is no reliable way to do an A600 accelerator. So i will not do it.
Btw.
What was the cause that this card initially worked only on some board revisions or was it only related to ROM?
The root cause was that for autovectors it was reading the data bus too fast. before the data was ready. When that happened it read FF instead of the correct autovector number and everything went downhill from there.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
PaulJ_2.0
Posts: 571
Joined: 11 May 2019 23:32

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by PaulJ_2.0 »

@terriblefire Any chance of bringing the build cost down further with a QFP 132 footprint? Those 030 CPU's are cheap and plentiful.
terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by terriblefire »

PaulJ_2.0 wrote: 15 Sep 2021 15:01 @terriblefire Any chance of bringing the build cost down further with a QFP 132 footprint? Those 030 CPU's are cheap and plentiful.
i'm not a fan of those. If they dont work you have to resolder them. And they dont work at 50Mhz ... if you're dropping down to 40mhz just use this...

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/172657814756 ... SwhvFZCZQ3

Plus like i said.. I'm actually done with Amiga accelerators. Once the current crop are sorted out there will be no more.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
PaulJ_2.0
Posts: 571
Joined: 11 May 2019 23:32

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by PaulJ_2.0 »

terriblefire wrote: 15 Sep 2021 15:18 I'm actually done with Amiga accelerators.
Fair enough, it was just an idea.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7451
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by PhilC »

@exxos made an adaptor from pga to smt cpus. The cpusbwould mostly work ok but required a heatsink to be fitted whereas the pga ones don't as you guys know.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
PaulJ_2.0
Posts: 571
Joined: 11 May 2019 23:32

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by PaulJ_2.0 »

PhilC wrote: 15 Sep 2021 18:55 @exxos made an adaptor from pga to smt cpus.
I was more interested in the cost savings by eliminating the need for a socket. I much prefer SMT in any scenario, even swapping out takes me seconds.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7451
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by PhilC »

@PaulJ_2.0 totally agree, the price of pga cpus has increased greatly but the smt ones haven't yet.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
Higgy
Posts: 489
Joined: 23 Apr 2019 20:05
Location: Somerset

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by Higgy »

I don't know if they die shrunk the QFP over its life, but the one on a Blizzard MK1 runs hot hot hot.
User avatar
kulamario
Posts: 238
Joined: 29 Nov 2019 19:20
Location: Greystones

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by kulamario »

Gold cpus is best
Smt never run on 50mhz
Higgy
Posts: 489
Joined: 23 Apr 2019 20:05
Location: Somerset

Re: TF1230 Beta Interest (Open Source)

Post by Higgy »

kulamario wrote: 15 Sep 2021 20:47 Gold cpus is best
Smt never run on 50mhz
Rev C is best as it had a die shrink so less heat produced.
Gold Rev C is the daddy :)

Return to “TF330”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 2 guests