TF536 on the ST
Re: TF536 on the ST
@terriblefire i tbought that might be the case. Ill disable them and see how things go.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
- Umberto1st
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:27 pm
Re: TF536 on the ST
I have been using Exxos V7 HD upgrade without any problems. I have even removed it to test the dma and found no difference. I would pull the hd upgrade and install a stock 68000 and retest. The HD upgrade has actually improved floppy reliability due to the 10k pull ups
3)1040 stf/m, 2)Mega 4 ST, 1)STE, 1)Mega STE, 1)STacy, 2)Falcon 030
Re: TF536 on the ST
@Umberto1st that's how I tested the floppy worked. Will pop the pullups onto a wd1772 and try with DD and the TF536
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
- Umberto1st
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:27 pm
Re: TF536 on the ST
I also did this fix for good measurePhilC wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:16 am @Umberto1st that's how I tested the floppy worked. Will pop the pullups onto a wd1772 and try with DD and the TF536
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1395
3)1040 stf/m, 2)Mega 4 ST, 1)STE, 1)Mega STE, 1)STacy, 2)Falcon 030
-
terriblefire
- Admin sponsor

- Posts: 5687
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF536 on the ST
Guys, I would park this for the time being. I have no time to investigate at the moment
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
- Umberto1st
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:27 pm
Re: TF536 on the ST
Appreciate all the help, do what you need to do my friend, like I said I'm supposed to be working on a Falcon
3)1040 stf/m, 2)Mega 4 ST, 1)STE, 1)Mega STE, 1)STacy, 2)Falcon 030
- Umberto1st
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:27 pm
Re: TF536 on the ST
One other thing I have done on the V7 HD upgrade, is I am using a AJAX FDCPhilC wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:16 am @Umberto1st that's how I tested the floppy worked. Will pop the pullups onto a wd1772 and try with DD and the TF536
3)1040 stf/m, 2)Mega 4 ST, 1)STE, 1)Mega STE, 1)STacy, 2)Falcon 030
Re: TF536 on the ST
That may be why yours works at 1.44mb when mine doesn't as mines a standard 1772Umberto1st wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:40 amOne other thing I have done on the V7 HD upgrade, is I am using a AJAX FDCPhilC wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:16 am @Umberto1st that's how I tested the floppy worked. Will pop the pullups onto a wd1772 and try with DD and the TF536
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
- Umberto1st
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:27 pm
Re: TF536 on the ST
Could be, but I also have a STFM set up for the TF534/536 with a ver 5 HD and a 1772 and it worksPhilC wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:19 amThat may be why yours works at 1.44mb when mine doesn't as mines a standard 1772Umberto1st wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:40 am
One other thing I have done on the V7 HD upgrade, is I am using a AJAX FDC
3)1040 stf/m, 2)Mega 4 ST, 1)STE, 1)Mega STE, 1)STacy, 2)Falcon 030
- Umberto1st
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:27 pm
Re: TF536 on the ST
Try turning cache off, you can do it in xboot or the general tab in the control panel. I have found that cache turned on can mess with the floppy.PhilC wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:19 amThat may be why yours works at 1.44mb when mine doesn't as mines a standard 1772Umberto1st wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:40 am
One other thing I have done on the V7 HD upgrade, is I am using a AJAX FDC
3)1040 stf/m, 2)Mega 4 ST, 1)STE, 1)Mega STE, 1)STacy, 2)Falcon 030
