If you mean the DEFAULT GB6 setting.. that can vary between versions as well.. But I guess in future releases I will make sure DEFAULT is TOS206 STE or something. it may prevent some confusion with how it works..Steve wrote: 23 Feb 2021 15:14 I've always tested against 'DEFAULT' assuming others probably would/should do the same. I think there are only two logical test methods: current system vs stock same system & current system vs gembench default.
TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28362
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!
-
DoG
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: 07 Apr 2018 12:26
Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!
I usually test against STFM1048 file. That is normal ST without blitter, TOS 1.04. Default on my copy is a STe with TOS 2.06.
-
Badwolf
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 3043
- Joined: 19 Nov 2019 12:09
Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!
Very cool, thanks. Just shows the hardware may have got cheaper but it’s going to produce the same results with the same basic assumptions. TF’s just a smidge quicker on the AltRAM than PAK and I’ve still got to shave 20% off somewhere!frank.lukas wrote: 23 Feb 2021 14:44 ... to compare with a 25 years old hardware design
PAK68/3-030 - 50Mhz with 64MB Fastram
P030_ST.jpg
P030_TT.jpg
Cheers,
BW.
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 5 guests