As a update. I tested 3 motherboards with 1712 shifter. These boards are the integrated blitter types with 001A DMA. A quick test and they all give the diagonal pattern and I don't see any issues from power up.
My other boards are external blitter types but have the original 588 shifter. So I didn't bother to test (machines in a bit of a state anyway)
I would have concluded the 1712 shifter is simply not compatible with the integrated blitter GST. This seems to be the trend currently. But @Steve's STE had the graphics problem with 588 shifter by the looks of it ? So maybe we should be documenting GST numbers at this point..
EDIT:
Its not a big enough sample set to draw any conclusions.but....
Looks like:
588 shifter is paired with 1989 batch GST (external blitter).
1712 shifter is paired with 1990 batch GST (external blitter)
1712 shifter is paired with 1991 blitter GST (integrated blitter)
I can't imagine batch codes being the problem, but something has changed causing the problems. I can only assume at this point, the 1712 shifter is not compatible with the 1989 batch GST. I don't have enough boards or test results to make any more headway with this problem.
But my tests do show some issues swapping the shifters. I'd assume the 588 shifter would work fine in any board, but the 1712 would not. Then the dumb-luck factor if a board has the problem or not, like it normally is!
STE video chip
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28357
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
-
Steve
- Posts: 3305
- Joined: 15 Sep 2017 11:49
Re: STE video chip
I'll open up my STe's tomorrow to remind myself which one I installed the little board in. I vaguely remembering installing it in both at one point.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28357
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: STE video chip
Thanks. If yours doesn't fit my proposed theory, then its likely a borderline timing issue with something again. I guess different batches of chips could effect things just enough to make or break things, if they are "on the edge" already.Steve wrote: 27 Oct 2023 18:30 I'll open up my STe's tomorrow to remind myself which one I installed the little board in. I vaguely remembering installing it in both at one point.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28357
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: STE video chip
:roll:
Ain't going though JLC part souchong nightmare again. So will have to get shelved again unless there's a flood of people appearing with the same problem to warrant all the hassle of getting them made.
I do still have 5 of the prototype boards left anyway..
Ain't going though JLC part souchong nightmare again. So will have to get shelved again unless there's a flood of people appearing with the same problem to warrant all the hassle of getting them made.
I do still have 5 of the prototype boards left anyway..
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Steve
- Posts: 3305
- Joined: 15 Sep 2017 11:49
Re: STE video chip
@exxos I just checked and I have the little board fitted in my 588 STe but not my 1712 STe (Although I did try it in the 1712, but removed it as it wasn't required)
For me it was for fixing blitter heavy demos. I never had the strange video output corruption you demonstrate. But it worked for fixing my blitter issues.
ps - I noticed, mine have the variable pot, but I never touched it. I assume it was set correctly to begin with from you?
For me it was for fixing blitter heavy demos. I never had the strange video output corruption you demonstrate. But it worked for fixing my blitter issues.
ps - I noticed, mine have the variable pot, but I never touched it. I assume it was set correctly to begin with from you?
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28357
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: STE video chip
Hmmm did your problem STE have P100 as 1.2k ?Steve wrote: 28 Oct 2023 12:20 @exxos I just checked and I have the little board fitted in my 588 STe but not my 1712 STe (Although I did try it in the 1712, but removed it as it wasn't required)
For me it was for fixing blitter heavy demos. I never had the strange video output corruption you demonstrate. But it worked for fixing my blitter issues.
ps - I noticed, mine have the variable pot, but I never touched it. I assume it was set correctly to begin with from you?
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28357
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: STE video chip
It's a odd one.I have had the odd blitter behave oddly but never looked into it. But not sure how the shifter 16mhz sync would get effected by the blitter :shrug:
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28357
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: STE video chip
I tried @ijor's blitter test program here viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6040 But I can't seem to get the more corrupted background lines on this machine now. But I can corrupt the video to give the same video faults. So there could be 2 problems in the mix of all this.
So I think other than looking at the video visually there does not seem to be any reliable method for detecting such glitches easily :(
So I think other than looking at the video visually there does not seem to be any reliable method for detecting such glitches easily :(
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28357
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: STE video chip
Found 2 other STEs with 588 shifter. Though swapping to the 1712 shifter doesn't yield the expected results and both seem fine :roll:
I even tried heating up the GST but nothing changed.
So the sort of conclusion so far is that the 1712 shifter may not work in some early machines depending on the alignment of the planets etc
I even tried heating up the GST but nothing changed.
So the sort of conclusion so far is that the 1712 shifter may not work in some early machines depending on the alignment of the planets etc
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 8 guests