Further to throwing ideas around, and I know its drifting from STFM/e a bit, but it may invoke other areas of study...
Is there any way we can memory map an address range for something like what you are building to the TTRAM only address range?
Although this would exclude the STRAM/ALTRAM blitter access, the full 32Mhz+ CPU read/write access speed would make up for it.
REMINDER - Stay logged in for at least 2 hours a week to get whitelisted.
Also it helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from for detection scripts.
:o)
Also it helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from for detection scripts.
:o)
David's ST Graphics Card v0.2
-
mrbombermillzy
- Moderator

- Posts: 2305
- Joined: 03 Jun 2018 19:37
-
Badwolf
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 3044
- Joined: 19 Nov 2019 12:09
Re: David's ST Graphics Card v0.2
The advantage to using the lower 16MB range is that a) it'll work with 68000 but also b) is blitterable. But if it's located on an accelerated bus it'll still be accelerated.mrbombermillzy wrote: 04 Oct 2023 17:49 Further to throwing ideas around, and I know its drifting from STFM/e a bit, but it may invoke other areas of study...
Is there any way we can memory map an address range for something like what you are building to the TTRAM only address range?
Although this would exclude the STRAM/ALTRAM blitter access, the full 32Mhz+ CPU read/write access speed would make up for it.
There's nothing to stop a 32 bit board having 32 bit access to its own AltRAM.
BW
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, exxos and 15 guests