Motherboards in early 520STFMs

General discussions or ideas about hardware.
User avatar
JezC
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 11:44 pm

Re: Motherboards in early 520STFMs

Post by JezC »

In my 30+ STF/M models, a mix of 520s & 1040s, none have a blitter or even a socket for one (though lots do have the footprint for the socket).

My Mega4 does have one fitted.

Also, the 20+ 'junk' motherboards I got from Exxos looked never to have had a socket or a blitter fitted.

Not by any means conclusive but it seems to contradict the advertising :shrug:
User avatar
atari030
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 12:43 pm

Re: Motherboards in early 520STFMs

Post by atari030 »

Late FM's were sold alongside E's. Atari wouldn't spend the cash on that.

Do you still have any copies of the Ad's? I have a ton of Pommy and US mags and can't recall seeing a blitter advertised. Not saying your wrong, it'd be an interesting to find they did.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28614
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Motherboards in early 520STFMs

Post by exxos »

I've never seen a STFM with a socket, space for one yes. Eary ST's didnt even have the footprint for one. Some MEGA ST's had a blitter, but not all of them. IIRC there might have been supply issues.
polbit
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 2:45 am

Re: Motherboards in early 520STFMs

Post by polbit »

Technically then, getting a 520STFM is better than the 1040STF(M) because there is a higher probability of a newer MB, not the silly layout, and less RAM to desolder when upgrading...
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28614
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Motherboards in early 520STFMs

Post by exxos »

STFMs are generally better machines to go for. But with so many versions of the motherboards, its still just down to luck.
Post Reply

Return to “HARDWARE DISCUSSIONS”