TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Benchmark screenshots for various boosters & machines.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28360
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

TF536 ST edition - MAPROM1.8E - TOS206

IMG_0358.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Cyprian
Posts: 542
Joined: 22 Dec 2017 09:16
Location: Warszawa, Poland

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by Cyprian »

Interesting figures.

I wonder why the best results are with Instruction Cache Off. - D ON, I OFF
ATW800/2 / V4sa / Lynx I / Mega ST 1 / 7800 / Portfolio / Lynx II / Jaguar / TT030 / Mega STe / 800 XL / 1040 STe / Falcon030 / 65 XE / 520 STm / SM124 / SC1435
DDD HDD / AT Speed C16 / TF536 / SDrive / PAK68/3 / Lynx Multi Card / LDW Super 2000 / XCA12 / SkunkBoard / CosmosEx / SatanDisk / UltraSatan / USB Floppy Drive Emulator / Eiffel / SIO2PC / Crazy Dots / PAM Net
http://260ste.atari.org
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28360
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

Cyprian wrote: 14 Feb 2022 08:15 Interesting figures.

I wonder why the best results are with Instruction Cache Off. - D ON, I OFF
No idea. But IIRC on the falcon the data cache on made the tests about 3% slower. So caches don't always help.
User avatar
alexh
Site sponsor
Site sponsor
Posts: 1338
Joined: 17 Oct 2017 16:51
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by alexh »

Cyprian wrote: 14 Feb 2022 08:15 I wonder why the best results are with Instruction Cache Off. - D ON, I OFF
Cache line fills from DRAM take more time than a single instruction fetch. Even with 030 burst mode. That time is usually made up when the CPU executes the full line from CACHE and doesn't read from DRAM. If the CPU doesn't execute a full cache line, perhaps due to branching, then the benefit of the cache is reduced. Even more so if that cache line becomes invalidated and re-filled due to code alignment. (Sometimes called cache thrashing) So depending on the code, iCache performance can be worse than no iCache.
Senior Principal ASIC Engineer - SystemVerilog, VHDL
Thalion Webshrine - http://thalion.atari.org
ST,STf,STfm,STe,MegaST,MegaSTe,Falcon060
A500+,A600,A4000/060,CD32,CDTV
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28360
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

Return to “BENCHMARKS”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 4 guests