Me too.
I put mint-d91.prg in AUTO and GUIDES and MINT in the root of C: but why it's unstable I don't know...
I saw that you have a right MC68LC060 ? No FPU, just MMU, for me the same.

Me too.

For 68LC060, I would try using that as a base, then remove the sys-root folder and copy in the one from this package instead: freemint-latest-000-st_ste.zipluciodra wrote: 10 Dec 2024 07:42 On Freemint I still have some problems. I download this version:
Is that correct?

Tonight I try ;)agranlund wrote: 10 Dec 2024 14:04For 68LC060, I would try using that as a base, then remove the sys-root folder and copy in the one from this package instead: freemint-latest-000-st_ste.zipluciodra wrote: 10 Dec 2024 07:42 On Freemint I still have some problems. I download this version:
Is that correct?
That should give you a 68060 kernel with 68000 applications.
Or perhaps the opposite way around by using the 000 package as base and move in the kernel for 060. Not sure which is easier to get right.
I usually remove/move-away the xdd, xfs and xix files I do not use as well so you're not spending boot time on loading modules that you're not using, or loading-and-failing on things it cannot use anyway.

Right now the intended non-raven codepath is just a stub but I've kept it in mind to be able to build the auto-loaded part with x86core inside instead of using the one already in ravens bootrom. Other than that I think it's mostly a few ISA addressing differences.artik-wroc wrote: 10 Dec 2024 09:49 Would there be a chance of some VGA driver loaded from AUTO? I'm asking because I'd like to play around with Panther :)

Tested:agranlund wrote: 10 Dec 2024 00:59 I'm planning to push this new rom onto Github but if someone wants to give it a go first then by all means :)
raven_rom_241210.zip
Best case, nothing should really change - if you're using Nova then hopefully Nova will still initialise properly on your card.
EmuTOS's mono driver is now disabled and the boot rom is now instead taking care of setting up an equivalent resolution.
That should, in theory, work with any card that claims to be VGA compatible so if you have something that is not ET4000 or Mach it'd be interesting to hear the result.
I've tested with the following cards.
(Interesting how the ET4000 bios's are saying less memory than what is certainly on the card.. both of them can do 1280x720x256 just fine)
Code: Select all
ATI Mach32 GRAPHICS ULTRA PRO, BIOS P/N 112-18900-100 ET4000/W32i ET4000/W32I ISA BIOS 06/17/1995 512KB display memory ET4000AX TsengLab Int'l ET4000 BIOS Date : 01/10/92 256KB display memory CL-GD5426 SpeedStar PRO Vers. 2.04 (c) Diamond Computer Systems, Inc. 1 MB display memory installed CL-GD5426 REVEAL Bios Version 1.31 3/4/94 (c) 1994 VidTech Microsystems Inc.
The plan is to keep it so the rom only inits the card to the standard 640x480x2 colors.
SVGA modes and functionality differs between vendors and cards during these early VESA days so it makes sense these become loadable drivers from the auto folder + a common NVDI screen driver.. assuming motivation keeps up :)
But again, NOVA with a Mach or W32i is the optimal setup for sure.
This here is mostly for my own amusement.



I'm sure things may pop up as different cards/bioses are tested but I would think compatibility rate is probably quite high for just about any VGA card.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 40 guests