TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Benchmark screenshots for various boosters & machines.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7440
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by PhilC »

This is a quick benchmark taken with the TF536, with the rom running from fast ram using @agranlund Maprom program.
20200625_174646.jpg
Not bad for a first attempt but this card will fly once its had all the usual software tweaks applied.
(Btw, ran using EmuTOS)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28344
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

If you run GB6 from fast-ram then it should greatly increase speeds as well.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7440
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by PhilC »

exxos wrote: 25 Jun 2020 18:01 If you run GB6 from fast-ram then it should greatly increase speeds as well.
I'll try that once I find out how. Something to do with setting app flags?
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28344
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

PhilC wrote: 25 Jun 2020 18:10 I'll try that once I find out how. Something to do with setting app flags?
Yep, use PRGFLAGS, tick all the boxes for GB6 in the list..
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7440
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by PhilC »

You're not wrong @exxos heres the benchmark with GB6 running and using TT ram.
20200625_182607.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
terriblefire
Admin sponsor
Admin sponsor
Posts: 5686
Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
Location: Glasgow, UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by terriblefire »

PhilC wrote: 25 Jun 2020 18:27 You're not wrong @exxos heres the benchmark with GB6 running and using TT ram.
Matches SysInfo numbers.. 17 times faster.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28344
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

@PhilC when you get a moment can you repeat the 2 tests but with the caches turned off ?
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7440
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by PhilC »

exxos wrote: 16 Jan 2022 14:52 @PhilC when you get a moment can you repeat the 2 tests but with the caches turned off ?
Probably be a few days before I get time again.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28344
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

PhilC wrote: 16 Jan 2022 18:22
exxos wrote: 16 Jan 2022 14:52 @PhilC when you get a moment can you repeat the 2 tests but with the caches turned off ?
Probably be a few days before I get time again.
:poke:
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28344
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: TF536 and H4 Benchmark

Post by exxos »

TF536 ST edition - MAPROM1.8E - EMUTOS


D & I cache ON

IMG_0354.JPG

D & I cache OFF

IMG_0355.JPG

D ON, I OFF

IMG_0356.JPG

D OFF , I ON

IMG_0357.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Return to “BENCHMARKS”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest