Can all registered uses please login, even just for a few minutes..
It helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from..
Thanks :)
It helps build a picture where our "good traffic" is coming from..
Thanks :)
Server updates
- viking272
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:32 am
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
Re: Server updates
Isn’t that the behaviour between being logged out and logged in? If you’re not logged in you only see the homepage.
Re: Server updates
Right, recent topics works correctly when logged in, but does not work when logged out. The problem there is the index pages served from a html "copy" of the index and isn't served live anymore. So the reason topics extension cannot change the paid content because it isn't actually even running.
I will see if I can come up with a fix for it..
I will see if I can come up with a fix for it..
- viking272
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:32 am
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK
Re: Server updates
We are almost at the stage where the forum could be totally behind a paywall and the sign up takes a credit card for a nominal one off fee.
That will stop free accounts being setup and AI/crawlers scavenging the site.
It may discourage a few legitimate users sadly but could be a quick win.
You also reserve the right to charge the card £1000 if the account is used in AI/crawler activities
That will stop free accounts being setup and AI/crawlers scavenging the site.
It may discourage a few legitimate users sadly but could be a quick win.
You also reserve the right to charge the card £1000 if the account is used in AI/crawler activities
Re: Server updates
Yeah the pay wall thing was actually discussed probably about a year ago somewhere. Like you says has obvious consequences and drawbacks. The problem is though it may not actually help anyway..viking272 wrote: Thu Sep 17, 2026 11:01 am We are almost at the stage where the forum could be totally behind a paywall and the sign up takes a credit card for a nominal one off fee.
That will stop free accounts being setup and AI/crawlers scavenging the site.
It may discourage a few legitimate users sadly but could be a quick win.
You also reserve the right to charge the card £1000 if the account is used in AI/crawler activities![]()
For example the login and register pages get a significant amount of traffic already and if those were the only two pages accessible publicly I can guarantee those two pages would get hammered with millions of requests every hour. So the content hidden behind it is basically irrelevant. Of course having many pages on the website amplifies that problem yes.
There is a ton of signup protection which is mostly hosted by CleanTalk services. The problem is with every system, it works fine until it doesn't.
Generally I don't like to have third-party companies involved but that company actually seems to act upon my requests for changes and problems and the service obviously does work.. But of course costs money.
In terms of AI, that's another topic in its own right...
viewtopic.php?t=8524
Re: Server updates
There was a typo in the nginx config stopping it from working correctly. seems ok for me now as well.peters wrote: Thu Sep 17, 2026 10:00 am I am not sure where to report web page issues but I noticed an odd thing this morning.
When on the board index page and I click on the page numbers or the Right arrow it doesn't change page, it just scrolls down a little bit.
PS.
Now it is working again. Might have been a local issue but I didn't even close the browser.
Re: Server updates
We seem to have some unwelcome guests. Not causing any issues as such, just they shouldn't be there. This one is a bit of a tricky one to diagnose.
EDIT:
Orange France seems to be the largest contributor but still only accounts for 2.8% of traffic.
EDIT2:
A small sample window was taken and this is the breakdown so our friends in Brazil are the biggest slice so far again...
Guest traffic by country - live snapshot 2026-09-18
Total distinct guest IPs: 2,693 | Total session rows: 3,311 | Countries seen: 137
EDIT:
Orange France seems to be the largest contributor but still only accounts for 2.8% of traffic.
EDIT2:
A small sample window was taken and this is the breakdown so our friends in Brazil are the biggest slice so far again...
Guest traffic by country - live snapshot 2026-09-18
Total distinct guest IPs: 2,693 | Total session rows: 3,311 | Countries seen: 137
Code: Select all
# | CC | IPs | % | Sessions | ASNs
---+----+-----+--------+----------+-----
1 | BR | 400 | 14.85% | 401 | 279
2 | US | 337 | 12.51% | 481 | 69
3 | GB | 153 | 5.68% | 162 | 28
4 | FR | 152 | 5.64% | 152 | 6
5 | ES | 146 | 5.42% | 146 | 27
6 | CA | 138 | 5.12% | 141 | 30
7 | DE | 126 | 4.68% | 129 | 17
8 | AR | 108 | 4.01% | 108 | 58
9 | IT | 107 | 3.97% | 108 | 19
10 | IN | 95 | 3.53% | 95 | 37
11 | RU | 66 | 2.45% | 67 | 42
12 | TR | 59 | 2.19% | 63 | 13
13 | UA | 49 | 1.82% | 50 | 44
14 | MX | 47 | 1.75% | 49 | 23
15 | PK | 45 | 1.67% | 45 | 16
16 | VE | 32 | 1.19% | 32 | 14
17 | ZA | 28 | 1.04% | 28 | 20
18 | BD | 28 | 1.04% | 29 | 27
19 | PH | 27 | 1.00% | 27 | 15
20 | PL | 27 | 1.00% | 27 | 16
21 | CO | 25 | 0.93% | 25 | 21
22 | HK | 20 | 0.74% | 346 | 2
23 | BE | 20 | 0.74% | 20 | 3
24 | CL | 20 | 0.74% | 21 | 9
25 | UY | 19 | 0.71% | 19 | 3
26 | ID | 19 | 0.71% | 19 | 16
27 | EC | 19 | 0.71% | 19 | 16
28 | AE | 15 | 0.56% | 15 | 3
29 | EG | 13 | 0.48% | 13 | 4
30 | PT | 13 | 0.48% | 13 | 4
31 | DO | 13 | 0.48% | 13 | 9
32 | IE | 12 | 0.45% | 12 | 5
33 | NL | 12 | 0.45% | 12 | 4
34 | AT | 11 | 0.41% | 11 | 4
35 | VN | 10 | 0.37% | 10 | 2
36 | KG | 10 | 0.37% | 10 | 5
37 | BA | 9 | 0.33% | 9 | 5
38 | IQ | 8 | 0.30% | 8 | 6
39 | BG | 8 | 0.30% | 8 | 8
40 | TN | 7 | 0.26% | 7 | 3
41 | CH | 7 | 0.26% | 7 | 4
42 | TT | 7 | 0.26% | 7 | 4
43 | SE | 7 | 0.26% | 7 | 3
44 | MD | 7 | 0.26% | 7 | 5
45 | MA | 6 | 0.22% | 6 | 1
46 | OM | 6 | 0.22% | 6 | 2
47 | KZ | 6 | 0.22% | 6 | 4
48 | SK | 6 | 0.22% | 6 | 5
49 | GT | 5 | 0.19% | 5 | 2
50 | RS | 5 | 0.19% | 5 | 4
51 | LY | 5 | 0.19% | 5 | 4
52 | AL | 5 | 0.19% | 5 | 4
53 | CZ | 5 | 0.19% | 5 | 4
54 | AZ | 5 | 0.19% | 5 | 4
55 | LB | 5 | 0.19% | 5 | 5
56 | RO | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 1
57 | BB | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 1
58 | LV | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 1
59 | IL | 4 | 0.15% | 24 | 2
60 | AO | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 2
61 | MZ | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 3
62 | TZ | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 3
63 | KE | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 4
64 | HN | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 4
65 | NP | 4 | 0.15% | 4 | 4
66 | ZW | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 2
67 | MK | 3 | 0.11% | 4 | 2
68 | GR | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 2
69 | PR | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 2
70 | DK | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 2
71 | BH | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
72 | PY | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
73 | HU | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
74 | HR | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
75 | KR | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
76 | JM | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
77 | UG | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
78 | NG | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 3
79 | KW | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 1
80 | PS | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 1
81 | CV | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 1
82 | GA | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 1
83 | DZ | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
84 | PE | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
85 | FI | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
86 | GE | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
87 | EE | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
88 | CD | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
89 | CN | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
90 | NA | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
91 | MQ | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
92 | XK | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
93 | GM | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 2
94 | VG | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
95 | GH | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
96 | SY | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
97 | XX | 1 | 0.04% | 101 | 1
98 | IS | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
99 | LU | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
100| CM | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
101| AM | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
102| SA | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
103| VC | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
104| MF | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
105| CY | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
106| ST | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
107| SX | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
108| ML | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
109| GY | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
110| BJ | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
111| BM | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
112| LK | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
113| AG | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
114| DM | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
115| SG | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
116| MG | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
117| GW | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
118| NO | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
119| MU | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
120| ET | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
121| JE | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
122| BY | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
123| SS | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
124| BO | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
125| CW | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
126| AU | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
127| PF | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
128| IR | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
129| FJ | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
130| SI | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
131| MW | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
132| LR | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
133| JP | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
134| SZ | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
135| SD | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
136| CU | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
137| PA | 1 | 0.04% | 1 | 1
Re: Server updates
I am starting to see a picture of what happened there. Basically some IP addresses and ranges were not being banned because members have been seen in those ranges. That was part of the member protection guard. Though the problem is, it has a flaw , that there are over 500 accounts which have been deactivated by the moderators, likely for spamming etc. Those accounts got mistakenly included in the "members seen" protection logic..oops...
So currently those deactivated accounts are now being deleted properly and the scripts updated to take this scenario into account as a backup. Also any accounts which have not logged in for over two years and with zero posts will automatically get deleted as I class those accounts has abandoned.
So currently those deactivated accounts are now being deleted properly and the scripts updated to take this scenario into account as a backup. Also any accounts which have not logged in for over two years and with zero posts will automatically get deleted as I class those accounts has abandoned.
Re: Server updates
The traffic flood suddenly stopped around 8.10pm. Like seen previously, it just suddenly stops. It's a very thinly spread botnet. I did wonder I'd they were tail ends of other blocked botnets but it's hard to tell. It doesn't seem to have tripped any of my scanning scripts either. Doesn't seem to be any pattern other than it just stopped dead. So I'm building a ip list of during and after the flood to try and build a picture of what's going on.
Re: Server updates
**A quick word on the "guests online" number**
A few of you have noticed the guest count creeping up to some fairly silly figures lately. Worth explaining what that number actually is, because it isn't quite what it looks like.
Every post has a permalink, the kind of link you get when you click "quote" or copy a link to a specific post. Those links point at the post itself rather than the page it's on, so when someone clicks one the forum has to work out which topic and which page that post actually lives on, then bounce the visitor straight there. That bounce takes a fraction of a second and the visitor never sees it happen.
The bug, or rather the oversight, is that the forum logs that bounce as a guest viewing a page, even though no page was ever shown. So a search engine revisiting an old indexed link, or anything else following one of these links in bulk, shows up in the guest count as though it were someone sat there reading, when really it came and went in an instant.
Had a proper look tonight and the numbers back this up. In the same hour the "guests online" figure said a few hundred, well over half of those guests had no other footprint on the board at all. No topic viewed, nothing. Just the bounce.
So if the guest count looks worryingly high, it isn't the forum being under siege, it's more a case of the till ringing every time someone walks past the shop rather than through the door. Not fixed yet, but now that it's understood properly it will be.
Edit
Found the buggers with 99.88% accuracy
need to build a new script for those now

A few of you have noticed the guest count creeping up to some fairly silly figures lately. Worth explaining what that number actually is, because it isn't quite what it looks like.
Every post has a permalink, the kind of link you get when you click "quote" or copy a link to a specific post. Those links point at the post itself rather than the page it's on, so when someone clicks one the forum has to work out which topic and which page that post actually lives on, then bounce the visitor straight there. That bounce takes a fraction of a second and the visitor never sees it happen.
The bug, or rather the oversight, is that the forum logs that bounce as a guest viewing a page, even though no page was ever shown. So a search engine revisiting an old indexed link, or anything else following one of these links in bulk, shows up in the guest count as though it were someone sat there reading, when really it came and went in an instant.
Had a proper look tonight and the numbers back this up. In the same hour the "guests online" figure said a few hundred, well over half of those guests had no other footprint on the board at all. No topic viewed, nothing. Just the bounce.
So if the guest count looks worryingly high, it isn't the forum being under siege, it's more a case of the till ringing every time someone walks past the shop rather than through the door. Not fixed yet, but now that it's understood properly it will be.
Edit
Found the buggers with 99.88% accuracy
