Page 16 of 43
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 02 Oct 2023 23:02
by stephen_usher
Raspberry Pis are no-longer "realtime" devices, they're "sometime" devices. :-)
(Actually, as soon as you have multiple cores accessing the hardware you can't guarantee timing due to contention.)
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 02:28
by dad664npc
A few more benchmark results on the Pi4 PiStorm-Atari running on an Atari STFM with 4MB RAM
PiStorm emulating 68020 + FPU with 128MB Alt-RAM, IDE disk-drives, ET4000 graphics @ 800x600x64k
Kronos running via Mint
screendump5.png
screendump4.png
GEM benchmarks
CoreMark
screendump6.png
GemBench - ref STFM
screendump7.png
GemBench - ref PAK02016s
screendump8.png
GemBench - ref Falcon030
screendump9.png
Linpack
screendump10.png
Memspeed
screendump11.png
NemBench
screendump12.png
Sysinfo
screendump13.png
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 03:35
by exxos
Impressive!
:2k2: :bravo:
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 09:58
by mrbombermillzy
What Exxos said.
Great work going on there. :dualthumbup:
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 16:23
by Darklord
Truly awesome stuff going on there! <bows>
I'd be curious to see the results of a GemBench comparison between the PiSTorm
and a full blown 50 mhz Pak 68/3 (68030 and 68882 FPU with Alt-RAM)...I'm pretty
sure the PiSTorm would still batter it handily but it would be entertaining. :)
PS Or the TF boards...
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 16:43
by exxos
Darklord wrote: 03 Oct 2023 16:23
PS Or the TF boards...
Benchmarks are here
https://exxosforum.co.uk/atari/last/TF536/index.htm
Though the PIStorm would need benchmarking in ST-medium res for a proper comparison. Though looking at the results already, I think the PiStorum would be way faster.
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 17:02
by Darklord
Thanks. The TF's seem to be great performers.
I'd be interested in the TF / PiSTorm and 50mhz Pak 683/3 / PiSTorm
comparisons but from what I've seen and read, you're absolutely right,
the PiSTorm is gonna be the new standard.
Really looking forward to watching it's development. :)
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 17:04
by dad664npc
Darklord wrote: 03 Oct 2023 16:23
Truly awesome stuff going on there! <bows>
I'd be curious to see the results of a GemBench comparison between the PiSTorm
and a full blown 50 mhz Pak 68/3 (68030 and 68882 FPU with Alt-RAM)...I'm pretty
sure the PiSTorm would still batter it handily but it would be entertaining. :)
PS Or the TF boards...
I don't have PAK/30 with ALT-RAM results - but here are my tests
with 68020 ref PAK030
screendump14.png
with 68030 ref PAK030
screendump16.png
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 17:05
by dad664npc
exxos wrote: 03 Oct 2023 16:43
Darklord wrote: 03 Oct 2023 16:23
PS Or the TF boards...
Benchmarks are here
https://exxosforum.co.uk/atari/last/TF536/index.htm
Though the PIStorm would need benchmarking in ST-medium res for a proper comparison. Though looking at the results already, I think the PiStorum would be way faster.
So it looks like you referenced STFM for this test
68030 comparison
screendump17.png
Re: PiStorm Chat
Posted: 03 Oct 2023 17:10
by dad664npc
I have just realised the performance is even better if using 800x600x256 so the earlier tests can offer better Display performance
If anyone @exxos has GB6 results for PAK030 with ALT-RAM or results for any other high performance setups, could they send me them please