Page 1 of 2
Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 09:58
by rubber_jonnie
For a bit of fun, I snapped the STF remake board on top of the donor C070789 board just to compare.
Huge respect to exxos for the amazing reduction in scale :)
Size_Comparison.jpg
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 10:39
by exxos
:bravo: :coolpics:
Trying to get it even smaller as well :)
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 10:39
by sandord
Ha, there's almost enough space for a second ST :D
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 10:41
by rubber_jonnie
exxos wrote: 31 Oct 2018 10:39
:bravo: :coolpics:
Trying to get it even smaller as well :)
Pretty damn good for a first shot though.
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 10:42
by rubber_jonnie
sandord wrote: 31 Oct 2018 10:39
Ha, there's most enough space for a second ST :D
If he can make it smaller,maybe 3, parallel processing STs :)
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 12:56
by exxos
rubber_jonnie wrote: 31 Oct 2018 10:42
If he can make it smaller,maybe 3, parallel processing STs :)
Did ponder adding a second CPU.. but alas, a lot of work and no software to use it, so idea shelved..
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... =19&t=1242
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 16:06
by JezC
Maybe build in a MSTE or TT instead? Would say a Falcon but that is definitely a step too far :lol:
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 16:18
by rubber_jonnie
:lolbig:
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 16:28
by exxos
JezC wrote: 31 Oct 2018 16:06
Maybe build in a MSTE or TT instead? Would say a Falcon but that is definitely a step too far :lol:
Nah, this machine will beat them all eventually, those machines are pre-obsolete ;)
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: 31 Oct 2018 17:26
by JezC
Let's hope so.
I'd love to have a TT-beater for my MIDI setup :D