Re: General Stuff(tm)
Posted: 16 Jan 2026 23:11
I see you caved and went for the U1MB then 😁
We welcome retro users & hardware gurus alike! Come and join the party :)
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/
Yeah, I've seen better. Having done two now I'm lucky enough to have a reference, but the first one was fun and games. My two (800XL and 65XE) also have PokeyMax stereo and VBXL/XE so getting crowded inside.stephen_usher wrote: 17 Jan 2026 09:22 Yeah. :-)
The documentation is a bit pants isn't it, unless you want to update the firmware or do advanced stuff.
Did you get the instructions from here: U1MB on Lothareks sitestephen_usher wrote: 17 Jan 2026 09:22 The basics such as finding the key presses to get to the set-up menu (reset-start-help) I had to look at YouTube videos to find. Even wiring it up I had to use fizzy images on blog posts and it wasn't explicitly stated that the red line on the ribbon cable went to the pin 1 end of the sockets either. The docs are more like release notes than anything else.
Seeing as I have no background in the A8 hardware scene I still have no idea what the various RAM modes are as they're just named after original upgrades.
Nice, and a much neater installation than either of mine :dizzy:stephen_usher wrote: 19 Jan 2026 16:23 I've had time to look at the U1MB upgrade for the Atari 800XL and play with it. I've also had a chance, unlike in the rush on Friday afternoon, to take some better pictures of the installation.
Let's start with the installation.
First of all, the 3D printed mounting frame.
This bolts into two of the RF shield fixing holes, meaning that no new holes have to be drilled into the PCB, making this fully reversible. The I routed the ROM IDC cable out towards the front, which did mean that it was pushing on the frame a bit but that's not a problem. It makes the cable routing a bit cleaner IMHO.
IMG_4895.jpeg
IMG_4896.jpeg
I cut the other four flying wires to length and the longest one I hot glued in position.
IMG_4897.jpeg
The IDC cables lay pretty flat now with them laying over the add-on PCB.
IMG_4898.jpeg
If I had been designing the PCB I would have made the two IDC connectors 90 90 degree ones and both facing toward the front of the machine. The cables would have then lain flat (mostly) and if the four other wires had been on a right angled, four way Dupont socket at the rear would have made the whole thing a lot cleaner and look less unsightly too.
I've used M3 machine screw pushed up through the lower RF shield and secured by nuts. This stiffens the whole PCB, which should protect it, and it also allows the fitting of the grounding lugs for the expansion port. Once the washers arrive later today I'll finally finish everything on the inside and button it up. I've kept the upper shield, screws and the ROM and MMU chips so that in future this can all be reversed.
I think most of the need is so that they can be twisted and folded several times just to get the correct orientation for the sockets!rubber_jonnie wrote: 19 Jan 2026 16:48 The bracket does make it very neat for sure, I can't recall how mine are done. There are definitely design improvements that could be made. For one I find the cables are way too long, there seems to be no need for it.
Very likely...stephen_usher wrote: 19 Jan 2026 17:01I think most of the need is so that they can be twisted and folded several times just to get the correct orientation for the sockets!rubber_jonnie wrote: 19 Jan 2026 16:48 The bracket does make it very neat for sure, I can't recall how mine are done. There are definitely design improvements that could be made. For one I find the cables are way too long, there seems to be no need for it.
Indeed, and change the shape of the PCB so that it will fit low, beside the chip sockets... Lots of things could be improved, but won't be.rubber_jonnie wrote: 19 Jan 2026 17:02 Very likely...
I think if the install was a bit more 'standardised' they could likely get around some of that.
I don't see anything much changing other than firmware!stephen_usher wrote: 19 Jan 2026 17:07Indeed, and change the shape of the PCB so that it will fit low, beside the chip sockets... Lots of things could be improved, but won't be.rubber_jonnie wrote: 19 Jan 2026 17:02 Very likely...
I think if the install was a bit more 'standardised' they could likely get around some of that.