Page 3 of 3
Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!
Posted: 23 Feb 2021 15:15
by exxos
Steve wrote: 23 Feb 2021 15:14
I've always tested against 'DEFAULT' assuming others probably would/should do the same. I think there are only two logical test methods: current system vs stock same system & current system vs gembench default.
If you mean the DEFAULT GB6 setting.. that can vary between versions as well.. But I guess in future releases I will make sure DEFAULT is TOS206 STE or something. it may prevent some confusion with how it works..
Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!
Posted: 23 Feb 2021 15:40
by DoG
I usually test against STFM1048 file. That is normal ST without blitter, TOS 1.04. Default on my copy is a STe with TOS 2.06.
Re: TF536 & H5 fast as a mother fudge!
Posted: 23 Feb 2021 16:53
by Badwolf
frank.lukas wrote: 23 Feb 2021 14:44
... to compare with a 25 years old hardware design
PAK68/3-030 - 50Mhz with 64MB Fastram
P030_ST.jpg
P030_TT.jpg
Very cool, thanks. Just shows the hardware may have got cheaper but it’s going to produce the same results with the same basic assumptions. TF’s just a smidge quicker on the AltRAM than PAK and I’ve still got to shave 20% off somewhere!
Cheers,
BW.