For every address line you ignore, you get additional "mirrors" of your IDE adapter in the address space. Whether this is problematic or not depends on if there already is other hardware at the mirror address. In particular, if you don't decode A14 and A15 in an IDE adapter, you get mirrors at 0xF040xx, 0xF080xx, 0xF0C0xx. That might be okay, unless you have some third-party HW that resides at one of these addresses.LarryL wrote: 27 Jun 2024 13:21 Still not sure if I can work without A14 & A15 to reuse these inputs for IDE port selection and enable/disable…
You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
two IDE adapters inside ST
-
czietz
- Posts: 584
- Joined: 14 Jan 2018 13:02
Re: two IDE adapters inside ST
-
LarryL
- Posts: 237
- Joined: 20 Nov 2022 14:42
- Location: Germany
Re: two IDE adapters inside ST
thanks, understood...czietz wrote: 27 Jun 2024 17:08 For every address line you ignore, you get additional "mirrors" of your IDE adapter in the address space. Whether this is problematic or not depends on if there already is other hardware at the mirror address. In particular, if you don't decode A14 and A15 in an IDE adapter, you get mirrors at 0xF040xx, 0xF080xx, 0xF0C0xx. That might be okay, unless you have some third-party HW that resides at one of these addresses.
I doubt that there is "somewhere" an overview, what 3rd party HW is using which addresses? :mrgreen:
OK, I will try some searching...
maybe switching to a different CPLD and do full address decoding would be best...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 50 guests