You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!

CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Information and news about the 68SEC000 64MHz booster.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

Finally found the updated PCBs. I will try and build one up to test soon. I was planning to get 5 made up to test but the assembly place is kinda shut currently :( so I'm having to build stuff myself which is no fun at all. I cant test the SRAM boards until the new sec boards are built.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

So I have actually had the latest PCBs for a while.. But with so many projects constantly ongoing it is hard to find time to work on this these days :roll:

I need to build one of these up as this has the I/O port for the fast ram boards is shown a couple posts up..

sec4a.jpg

As shown in my blog earlier, I just hooked up a previous version to make sure it was all working fine before starting a new build... The new build had some pins rearranged and of course the 4 SRAM IC outputs... Basically I should be able to get like 64MHz into fast-ram. I really want to see what the proper results are for this speed on a basic 68000 CPU..

One reason for the delays in this project was because the SRAM chips were incredibly expensive and the board would cost around £120 just to make... This is the reason I started a new topic about porting the SDRAM controller from the TF330 to a new board, as it would be a lot cheaper to produce that way.. So I hope to make the fast ram as fast as possible, in the order of like 10ns, and make the board at a more sensible price. So while the booster has been around for a while, it could not really progress until the faster RAM board is completed..

In any case, I do have several of the original boards which are still untested, but I think when I build up hopefully the final SEC booster version I actually still working with one of these current fast ram boards... 64MHz speeds should be easily possible with this current setup.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

I guess I should have found the bits before pasting the board :lol: :roll:

Capture.PNG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
rpineau
Posts: 534
Joined: 17 Aug 2017 18:08
Location: USA

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by rpineau »

:lolbig:
I did exactly that last week. Fully pasted a board, starting installing all the main component, moved to the caps and resistor to realized I was missing a bunch !!!
Working ones : MegaSTE (68020) / TT030 / Falcon with AB040 & Eclipse / 1040STF
Need testing : Falcon with CT2
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

rpineau wrote: 19 Jan 2021 21:42 I did exactly that last week. Fully pasted a board, starting installing all the main component, moved to the caps and resistor to realized I was missing a bunch !!!
:lolbig: :bravo: :imwithstupid:
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

So the first annoyance with this...

2.PNG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

2nd attempt... I pushed the IC flat down on the desk to level the pins this time... I need to beep it all out next.. probably next one I do I probably print a bit more paste on the PCB..

Capture.PNG
EDIT:
Everything beeps out :)

Need to find a PLD to solder on the bottom now.. think I might be out of them :roll:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

So no PLD's... So your sacrifice is not in vain earlier version :2k2:

IMG_6121.JPG
IMG_6122.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

Pasting away..

IMG_6123.JPG

EDIT:

Talk about inconsistencies to what is actually pin one :roll:

Capture.PNG
2.PNG

This one (soldered down one) seems to be small dot is pin 1 , with the corner cut off more..
11.PNG

Assuming the small dot on the new chip, no corners are cut.. but then why have a BIG dot on the chip ? Does that mean its pin 1 or the smaller dot ?! All the corners look the same to me on this one...

22.PNG

I will have to assume the text is correct orientation and the smaller dot is still pin 1..
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 28211
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by exxos »

Anywhos, time for a bath with the board now..

Capture.PNG

EDIT:

All clean :)

Capture.PNG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Return to “SEC 64MHZ BOOSTER”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 2 guests