I do want to do that, but problem being like I had with the STE boosters, not all CPU's can overclock the same, and I don't know top speed unless I try it out on every CPU. So if I went SMT, I would have to do them all as 50MHz and hope for the best.
You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 27973
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7312
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
Yeah I did think about that. I've only tried the one SEC the you've sent me and will get myself some other oscillators to test on it but so far it looks good for either 32 50 and 64. So not too much messing around if you change them with hot air. Obviously not as easy as through hole though.exxos wrote: 28 Jan 2020 16:34I do want to do that, but problem being like I had with the STE boosters, not all CPU's can overclock the same, and I don't know top speed unless I try it out on every CPU. So if I went SMT, I would have to do them all as 50MHz and hope for the best.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 27973
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
I am hoping 64 will work on all. Though trying 3 oscillators may not sound much, but do it like 50 times and .. well.. nope :)PhilC wrote: 28 Jan 2020 16:37 Yeah I did think about that. I've only tried the one SEC the you've sent me and will get myself some other oscillators to test on it but so far it looks good for either 32 50 and 64. So not too much messing around if you change them with hot air. Obviously not as easy as through hole though.
I may see if I can put the SMT footprint on the rear of the PCB though anyway.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 27973
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
Managed to squash it under the DIP OSC. Also moved it all to the right so I can try and route the 4 pads to the PLD for the SRAM controls.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7312
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
Now that looks like a plan.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
Icky
- Site Admin

- Posts: 4286
- Joined: 03 Sep 2017 10:57
- Location: UK
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
Nice! :thumbup:exxos wrote: 28 Jan 2020 17:08 Managed to squash it under the DIP OSC. Also moved it all to the right so I can try and route the 4 pads to the PLD for the SRAM controls.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 27973
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
Managed to squash it all in..
Need to tweak the firmware as I moved a load of pins around on the PLD :roll:
EDIT:
For those not keeping up, those 4 headers are the IO drive to the fast-ram board... https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... 813#p21813
Need to tweak the firmware as I moved a load of pins around on the PLD :roll:
EDIT:
For those not keeping up, those 4 headers are the IO drive to the fast-ram board... https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... 813#p21813
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 27973
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
@Icky Did a render of the fast-ram boards a while ago... I am still waiting for these to come back from fab :roll:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 27973
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)
Not much progress due to a million other things going on as normal. BUT, I have just come across the box with the assembled SRAM boards in :D
So hopefully one day (this year!) I can plug the SEC booster into this SRAM board and we should get some super fast alt-ram with this combo!
So hopefully one day (this year!) I can plug the SEC booster into this SRAM board and we should get some super fast alt-ram with this combo!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7312
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
They look better than the 3d rendering :D
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 50 guests