You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!

CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Information and news about the 68SEC000 64MHz booster.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27973
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by exxos »

PhilC wrote: 28 Jan 2020 16:25 What about fitting an SMT Oscillator?
I do want to do that, but problem being like I had with the STE boosters, not all CPU's can overclock the same, and I don't know top speed unless I try it out on every CPU. So if I went SMT, I would have to do them all as 50MHz and hope for the best.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7312
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by PhilC »

exxos wrote: 28 Jan 2020 16:34
PhilC wrote: 28 Jan 2020 16:25 What about fitting an SMT Oscillator?
I do want to do that, but problem being like I had with the STE boosters, not all CPU's can overclock the same, and I don't know top speed unless I try it out on every CPU. So if I went SMT, I would have to do them all as 50MHz and hope for the best.
Yeah I did think about that. I've only tried the one SEC the you've sent me and will get myself some other oscillators to test on it but so far it looks good for either 32 50 and 64. So not too much messing around if you change them with hot air. Obviously not as easy as through hole though.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27973
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by exxos »

PhilC wrote: 28 Jan 2020 16:37 Yeah I did think about that. I've only tried the one SEC the you've sent me and will get myself some other oscillators to test on it but so far it looks good for either 32 50 and 64. So not too much messing around if you change them with hot air. Obviously not as easy as through hole though.
I am hoping 64 will work on all. Though trying 3 oscillators may not sound much, but do it like 50 times and .. well.. nope :)

I may see if I can put the SMT footprint on the rear of the PCB though anyway.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27973
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by exxos »

Managed to squash it under the DIP OSC. Also moved it all to the right so I can try and route the 4 pads to the PLD for the SRAM controls.

Capture.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7312
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by PhilC »

Now that looks like a plan.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
Icky
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4286
Joined: 03 Sep 2017 10:57
Location: UK

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by Icky »

exxos wrote: 28 Jan 2020 17:08 Managed to squash it under the DIP OSC. Also moved it all to the right so I can try and route the 4 pads to the PLD for the SRAM controls.
Nice! :thumbup:
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27973
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by exxos »

Managed to squash it all in..

Need to tweak the firmware as I moved a load of pins around on the PLD :roll:

Capture.JPG
EDIT:

For those not keeping up, those 4 headers are the IO drive to the fast-ram board... https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... 813#p21813
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27973
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by exxos »

@Icky Did a render of the fast-ram boards a while ago... I am still waiting for these to come back from fab :roll:

fastram.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27973
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC BOOSTER)

Post by exxos »

Not much progress due to a million other things going on as normal. BUT, I have just come across the box with the assembled SRAM boards in :D

So hopefully one day (this year!) I can plug the SEC booster into this SRAM board and we should get some super fast alt-ram with this combo!

IMG_5076.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7312
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: V2.5 BOOSTER CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)

Post by PhilC »

They look better than the 3d rendering :D
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.

Return to “SEC 64MHZ BOOSTER”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 50 guests