You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
TF536 on the STacy
-
stephen_usher
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 7331
- Joined: 13 Nov 2017 19:19
- Location: Oxford, UK.
Re: TF536 on the STacy
For bash it wouldn't be at all noticeable as it spends most of the time waiting for input.
Intro retro computers since before they were retro...
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.
-
czietz
- Posts: 578
- Joined: 14 Jan 2018 13:02
Re: TF536 on the STacy
Maybe FreeMiNT should at least mention it somewhere (outside of the Github issue tracker) that the 68020-60 builds require an FPU.
-
mikro
- Posts: 811
- Joined: 28 Aug 2017 23:22
- Location: Kosice, Slovakia
Re: TF536 on the STacy
Well, it does print that text message that it requires an FPU, doesn't it. ;)
To complicate things even more, 020+ kernel builds do not require FPU at all.
If more TF536 FreeMiNT users start popping up, we may reconsider adding another target but it's not as easy as adding one more line into our build scripts.
To complicate things even more, 020+ kernel builds do not require FPU at all.
If more TF536 FreeMiNT users start popping up, we may reconsider adding another target but it's not as easy as adding one more line into our build scripts.
-
derkom
- Moderator

- Posts: 1231
- Joined: 29 Jul 2018 18:45
Re: TF536 on the STacy
How many more do you need? I'm one. :)mikro wrote: 27 Nov 2020 07:03 If more TF536 FreeMiNT users start popping up, we may reconsider adding another target but it's not as easy as adding one more line into our build scripts.
I haven't actually installed FreeMiNT yet on any TF536 machine, but having it bootable on my Stacy is the eventual goal. Using the 68000 builds isn't the worst thing, but being able to use a proper 68020+ build would be nice. Really it depends on how "not as easy as adding one more line" it is. I won't be heartbroken if it's not worth the effort.
-
agranlund
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 1715
- Joined: 18 Aug 2019 22:43
- Location: Sweden
Re: TF536 on the STacy
I can confirm that the 68000 build + 68030 kernel works fine here without FPU and you'll get memory protection.
Use fastram.prg rather than maprom.prg if you're using the 68030 kernel though - MINT needs the MMU for its memory protection feature.
Use fastram.prg rather than maprom.prg if you're using the 68030 kernel though - MINT needs the MMU for its memory protection feature.
-
derkom
- Moderator

- Posts: 1231
- Joined: 29 Jul 2018 18:45
Re: TF536 on the STacy
And that much is probably fine with me. The 68030 kernel is certainly the most important part, and the rest being 68000 isn't really a problem, so I'd say if building the whole thing for 68030 without FPU is a non-trivial task, it's probably not worth it for just a few users.agranlund wrote: 27 Nov 2020 10:01 I can confirm that the 68000 build + 68030 kernel works fine here without FPU and you'll get memory protection.
-
Atarian Computing
- Posts: 579
- Joined: 22 Aug 2017 04:27
Re: TF536 on the STacy
I have the 192K boot-roms and then I seem to have to load the 256K EmuTOS after for MiNT to boot. I shouldn't need fastram.prg? I have MMU and the speed in MiNT indicates that fastram is ok. I also have almost 20MB of fastram used as well.agranlund wrote: 27 Nov 2020 10:01 I can confirm that the 68000 build + 68030 kernel works fine here without FPU and you'll get memory protection.
Use fastram.prg rather than maprom.prg if you're using the 68030 kernel though - MINT needs the MMU for its memory protection feature.
-
Steve
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: 15 Sep 2017 11:49
Re: TF536 on the STacy
@mikro
Hey Mikro are you aware of any lighter weight bash alternatives compiled for mint? I find bash to be very sluggish on my 030's. Of course I have tried mksh from the sparemint repo but it doesn't support bash alias commands. It's kind of funny that Linux distros are not using bash any more because they say it's bloated lol, I think they mainly use 'dash' now. But yeah if you get a spare moment I'd appreciate it if you looked in to it. Thank you
Hey Mikro are you aware of any lighter weight bash alternatives compiled for mint? I find bash to be very sluggish on my 030's. Of course I have tried mksh from the sparemint repo but it doesn't support bash alias commands. It's kind of funny that Linux distros are not using bash any more because they say it's bloated lol, I think they mainly use 'dash' now. But yeah if you get a spare moment I'd appreciate it if you looked in to it. Thank you
-
agranlund
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 1715
- Joined: 18 Aug 2019 22:43
- Location: Sweden
Re: TF536 on the STacy
Yeah it's only if you're booting from TOS2.06 it's needed. EmuTOS is able to find and register the fastram by itself :)Atarian Computing wrote: 27 Nov 2020 11:44I have the 192K boot-roms and then I seem to have to load the 256K EmuTOS after for MiNT to boot. I shouldn't need fastram.prg? I have MMU and the speed in MiNT indicates that fastram is ok. I also have almost 20MB of fastram used as well.agranlund wrote: 27 Nov 2020 10:01 I can confirm that the 68000 build + 68030 kernel works fine here without FPU and you'll get memory protection.
Use fastram.prg rather than maprom.prg if you're using the 68030 kernel though - MINT needs the MMU for its memory protection feature.
-
mikro
- Posts: 811
- Joined: 28 Aug 2017 23:22
- Location: Kosice, Slovakia
Re: TF536 on the STacy
IIRC, ST MiNT (https://subsole.org/st_mint) also uses mksh, maybe its newer version supports aliases?Steve wrote: 27 Nov 2020 12:35 Hey Mikro are you aware of any lighter weight bash alternatives compiled for mint? I find bash to be very sluggish on my 030's. Of course I have tried mksh from the sparemint repo but it doesn't support bash alias commands. It's kind of funny that Linux distros are not using bash any more because they say it's bloated lol, I think they mainly use 'dash' now. But yeah if you get a spare moment I'd appreciate it if you looked in to it. Thank you
Yeah, dash is an option but it's not 100% bash compatible. But it's a good idea, maybe we should really consider a more lightweight shell.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 2 guests