I'm in favour of smt caps etc, the board would be quicker to build with them.
Not sure if youd like this idea but how about a beginner and a pro version of the board?
Through hole on beginner and less expansion options and a pro version with smt and all the bells and whistles?
You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
Potential changes on a future board.
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7426
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28217
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
@PhilC have you seen this thread ? https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... =73&t=2231
In relation to caps and resistors, likely I would go with 1206 package, not too tiny to hand solder then.
In relation to caps and resistors, likely I would go with 1206 package, not too tiny to hand solder then.
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7426
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
@exxos I have now :D
Some of those larger caps are expensive, maybe keep those as through hole ceramics etc?
Some of those larger caps are expensive, maybe keep those as through hole ceramics etc?
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28217
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
Its possible we may not even need those larger caps.. theres that many caps on the board anyway...PhilC wrote: 15 Dec 2019 21:06 Some of those larger caps are expensive, maybe keep those as through hole ceramics etc?
-
derkom
- Moderator

- Posts: 1231
- Joined: 29 Jul 2018 18:45
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
What I meant is if you're considering putting a USB port on there for power, you might also consider making it a real USB port, by including the Lightning hardware in the board design. Depends on how far you want to go adding on to the original ST hardware as opposed to simply making the design better.exxos wrote: 15 Dec 2019 17:15Not sure I understand what your getting at there.. Lightning I know nothing about or USB, so I can't including it on anything relating to the H4 past what they have already developed which is just a plug in board on the CPU.derkom wrote: 15 Dec 2019 14:34 I don't know how much enhancement hardware you want to put on the main board, as opposed to plug-in upgrades, but how about including Lightning-compatible USB in the design, and giving it an external, powered port?
If you don't want to go as far as including full USB, consider possibilities of making it possible to use the built in port for either power or for the Lightning hardware for those who have it. This would probably require adding in a 9-pin USB header to connect either power or the Lightning board to, so it may be more hardware than you want to be adding, given only a few people would actually use it this way. Just a thought. :)
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28217
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
I can add some headers for it. The lightning guys I doubt are going to give me the design to include that hardware on the H4. You really would have to talk to them about doing a custom board for the H4.derkom wrote: 15 Dec 2019 21:23 What I meant is if you're considering putting a USB port on there for power, you might also consider making it a real USB port, by including the Lightning hardware in the board design. Depends on how far you want to go adding on to the original ST hardware as opposed to simply making the design better.
If you don't want to go as far as including full USB, consider possibilities of making it possible to use the built in port for either power or for the Lightning hardware for those who have it. This would probably require adding in a 9-pin USB header to connect either power or the Lightning board to, so it may be more hardware than you want to be adding, given only a few people would actually use it this way. Just a thought. :)
-
derkom
- Moderator

- Posts: 1231
- Joined: 29 Jul 2018 18:45
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
I don't know of any reason why their current board wouldn't work anyway. Just thinking about possible enhancements for future remake revisions.exxos wrote: 15 Dec 2019 21:28 I can add some headers for it. The lightning guys I doubt are going to give me the design to include that hardware on the H4. You really would have to talk to them about doing a custom board for the H4.
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28217
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
I thought someone plugged it in and tried it already anyway ? Just its a bit big for the H4 and covered a lot of the 68K sockets up.derkom wrote: 15 Dec 2019 21:34 I don't know of any reason why their current board wouldn't work anyway. Just thinking about possible enhancements for future remake revisions.
-
Smonson
- Posts: 717
- Joined: 28 Oct 2017 10:21
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
I have a very minor suggestion to slightly increase the contrast of the video from the DAC: instead of wiring each colour up as [2, 1, 0, gnd, gnd, gnd, gnd, gnd] you can go [2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, gnd, gnd]. That's basically what I do with the HDMI colour scale (except it's 4-bits instead of 3).
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28217
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: Potential changes on a future board.
I can do that.Smonson wrote: 16 Dec 2019 07:56 I have a very minor suggestion to slightly increase the contrast of the video from the DAC: instead of wiring each colour up as [2, 1, 0, gnd, gnd, gnd, gnd, gnd] you can go [2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, gnd, gnd]. That's basically what I do with the HDMI colour scale (except it's 4-bits instead of 3).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 23 guests