You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
TF360 Status
Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator
-
terriblefire
- Admin sponsor

- Posts: 5675
- Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF360 Status
Now have supaduper's card booting DiagROM at 78Mhz. :)
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 27908
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: TF360 Status
Ooo nice :). Is that with a rev6 CPU ?
-
supaduper
- Site sponsor

- Posts: 660
- Joined: 08 Nov 2018 12:05
Re: TF360 Status
Superstar status attained :)
-
kludge
- Posts: 400
- Joined: 08 Nov 2018 14:05
- Location: Sweden
Re: TF360 Status
Yeah, that sounds promising!
A kludge is a workaround or quick-and-dirty solution that is clumsy, inelegant, inefficient, difficult to extend and hard to maintain.
My lack of focus:
[ 8 * A500 ][ 2 * A500+ ][ 2 * A600 ][ 2 * A1200 ][ 2 * A2000 w/ A2386 ][ A4000 w/ TF4060, CyberVision 64 3D, FastLane SCSI Z3 ][ CD32 ][ VIC-20 ][ 4 * C64 Breadbin ][ 5 * C64C ][ 2 * C128 ][ C128D ][ C64 DTV ][ 3 * Mac Classics of different types ]
My lack of focus:
[ 8 * A500 ][ 2 * A500+ ][ 2 * A600 ][ 2 * A1200 ][ 2 * A2000 w/ A2386 ][ A4000 w/ TF4060, CyberVision 64 3D, FastLane SCSI Z3 ][ CD32 ][ VIC-20 ][ 4 * C64 Breadbin ][ 5 * C64C ][ 2 * C128 ][ C128D ][ C64 DTV ][ 3 * Mac Classics of different types ]
-
Higgy
- Posts: 477
- Joined: 23 Apr 2019 20:05
- Location: Somerset
Re: TF360 Status
78Mhz - you can't complain at that!
What is left to look at, Burst mode on RAM and the 3.3v supply? You mentioned previously about the CD Rom not working? Or did I get that wrong.
Out of interest here are some Sysinfo numbers I just found on a scrap of paper from previous internet searches:
Blizzard 1260 @ 66 Mhz - 50,560 Mips 53
Apollo. 1260 @ 80 Mhz - 58,284 Mips 62
Superduper - assuming you have a full CD32 with Reset switch it would be good to test PSU's, as my earlier issue with the TF330 not resetting was due to the PSU not being man enough. It seemed ok but resetting with the push button on top of the console resulted in a non-boot.
The lower current PSU also gave a lower intensity on the Power LED.
What is left to look at, Burst mode on RAM and the 3.3v supply? You mentioned previously about the CD Rom not working? Or did I get that wrong.
Out of interest here are some Sysinfo numbers I just found on a scrap of paper from previous internet searches:
Blizzard 1260 @ 66 Mhz - 50,560 Mips 53
Apollo. 1260 @ 80 Mhz - 58,284 Mips 62
Superduper - assuming you have a full CD32 with Reset switch it would be good to test PSU's, as my earlier issue with the TF330 not resetting was due to the PSU not being man enough. It seemed ok but resetting with the push button on top of the console resulted in a non-boot.
The lower current PSU also gave a lower intensity on the Power LED.
-
terriblefire
- Admin sponsor

- Posts: 5675
- Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF360 Status
It is.. i havent tried a rev 5 or 4 yet.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
-
alenppc
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 932
- Joined: 08 Nov 2018 12:59
Re: TF360 Status
I have almost every 060 revision, hopefully we can settle on something that will work on most so that people don’t have to hunt down a specific chip.
-
utri007
- Posts: 181
- Joined: 13 Nov 2018 22:20
Re: TF360 Status
I have a rev1 and rev6 68060 cpus and they work both same cards (apollo & blizzard) what would be situation when specifig rev would bee needed?
-
terriblefire
- Admin sponsor

- Posts: 5675
- Joined: 28 Aug 2017 22:56
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF360 Status
Rev 6 CPUs are (I think) a different manufacturing process and can clock to much higher speeds.
There may be other bug fixes. I’d need to look at the release notes
There may be other bug fixes. I’d need to look at the release notes
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
-
Higgy
- Posts: 477
- Joined: 23 Apr 2019 20:05
- Location: Somerset
Re: TF360 Status
exxos dumped a load of 060 info: https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/atari/last/ ... /index.htm
Main summary of changes (apart from some bug fixes):
rev1: maskset 01F43G (1994, engraved 0.60µm)
rev2: maskset 01G65V (1996, engraved 0.60µm)
rev5: maskset 74E41J (1998, engraved 0.42µm) - note that max 80Mhz was achieved according to weblink.
rev6: maskset 71E41J (1999, engraved 0.32µm)
I guess 'WhichAMIGA' prog is key here as it can read the Rev number. I am sure we have all heard about the effort gone to by people removing original markings and re-printing with Rev 6 maskset numbers!!!
Main summary of changes (apart from some bug fixes):
rev1: maskset 01F43G (1994, engraved 0.60µm)
rev2: maskset 01G65V (1996, engraved 0.60µm)
rev5: maskset 74E41J (1998, engraved 0.42µm) - note that max 80Mhz was achieved according to weblink.
rev6: maskset 71E41J (1999, engraved 0.32µm)
I guess 'WhichAMIGA' prog is key here as it can read the Rev number. I am sure we have all heard about the effort gone to by people removing original markings and re-printing with Rev 6 maskset numbers!!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 11 guests