You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!

ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Related information and WIP etc
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7283
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PhilC »

PaulJ wrote: 15 Apr 2019 00:35 Thanks Exxos, since its stone cold gotta be something stupid I should be able to find with a ohm meter. :)
My silly mistake was that I'd accidentally shorted two wires on the jumpers, thanks to a solder blob when doing the caps and resistors.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27908
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by exxos »

zack4mac wrote: 15 Apr 2019 06:54 Will this board see production for the store or is it be incorporated into the STF remake?
The current board is testing the design. There will be a production board but likely not anytime soon.
User avatar
zack4mac
Posts: 82
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 10:33
Location: Wales

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by zack4mac »

Groovy :yay2:

The best things come to those who wait

Cheers Exxos
XEGS, STF/FM/E CBM 64 VC20 PET , ZX81, ZX +3 Harlequin ZXuno
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 27908
Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
Location: UK

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by exxos »

PaulJ wrote: 14 Apr 2019 23:55 2. I can I get a schematic so I can put the ohm meter to work?
ide.zip
PaulJ wrote: 14 Apr 2019 23:55 3. Any words of wisdom?
Don't touch the hot end of the soldering iron :)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
rubber_jonnie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 14343
Joined: 17 Aug 2017 19:40
Location: Essex

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by rubber_jonnie »

Finally took delivery of the caps and resistors for the select 1 and select 2 jumpers, so they will be getting done as soon as I can find time, which is likely to be Wednesday evening.

I have my TOS 1.04/2.06 ROM now too, and my programmer is now fixed so I can flash 27C4096 ROMS happily.

Last thing will be to sort out a test board that has removable TOS ROMS, as the one I'm using (C103253) doesn't. Looking like my spare CO70789 will be getting the job, which is also a help since it has 1MB installed.
Collector of many retro things!
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
User avatar
PaulJ
Posts: 1568
Joined: 08 Apr 2018 01:14
Location: USA

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PaulJ »

exxos wrote: 15 Apr 2019 12:42
PaulJ wrote: 14 Apr 2019 23:55 2. I can I get a schematic so I can put the ohm meter to work?
ide.zip
PaulJ wrote: 14 Apr 2019 23:55 3. Any words of wisdom?
Don't touch the hot end of the soldering iron :)
Thanks for the schematic Exxos.... Yes after the picture of the damage done to RJ's digit I'm surprised RJ was able to get back up on that horse so soon. A lesser man would still be cowering in the closet.. :mrgreen: I ask the wife if the worst were to happen if I could use her cooking gloves and I was told in no uncertain terms I'd better be careful because she wasn't loaning them to a klutz that would pick up the business end of the iron..:) :) :) So in essence there is no room for error here. I should be using the scope here for awhile so in the immediate future I should be safe. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
User avatar
PaulJ
Posts: 1568
Joined: 08 Apr 2018 01:14
Location: USA

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PaulJ »

PhilC wrote: 15 Apr 2019 08:37
PaulJ wrote: 15 Apr 2019 00:35 Thanks Exxos, since its stone cold gotta be something stupid I should be able to find with a ohm meter. :)
My silly mistake was that I'd accidentally shorted two wires on the jumpers, thanks to a solder blob when doing the caps and resistors.
Ya, I went over the joints with the microscope and everything looks fine. I am wondering about the 84 pin PLCC socket. Some of the corner pins on the device had been bent a little.
User avatar
PhilC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7283
Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PhilC »

Yes, that sounds promising Paul as mine detected the drive right after I fixed my bodge.

BTW, the 44 marking is pin 1 :lol:
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
User avatar
PaulJ
Posts: 1568
Joined: 08 Apr 2018 01:14
Location: USA

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by PaulJ »

Ok, I found an anomaly I believe. According to the schematic IORDY is connected from pin 27 on the IDE connector through a 100 ohm resister to pin 6 on the sip to pin 62 on the plcc. I'm missing the connection from pin 62 on the plcc to pin 6 on the sip. It appears to be mixed up with the Icky specified fixes. Is the schematic correct in this area? :?: :?: :?:
User avatar
Icky
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4277
Joined: 03 Sep 2017 10:57
Location: UK

Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers

Post by Icky »

PaulJ wrote: 15 Apr 2019 22:02 Ok, I found an anomaly I believe. According to the schematic IORDY is connected from pin 27 on the IDE connector through a 100 ohm resister to pin 6 on the sip to pin 62 on the plcc. I'm missing the connection from pin 62 on the plcc to pin 6 on the sip. It appears to be mixed up with the Icky specified fixes. Is the schematic correct in this area? :?: :?: :?:
I'll check the schematic it might be the corrected one.

Return to “H4 MONGREL EDITION DEVELOPMENT & INFO”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 16 guests