You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
Check if your IP is banned
viewtopic.php?t=7286
viewtopic.php?t=7286
ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
BTW - The code hasn't even been tested this mod yet.. So the firmware might not actually be correct..
I'm building this circuit up on breadboard, with the MOSFETs I ordered the other day just to see what happens..
I'm building this circuit up on breadboard, with the MOSFETs I ordered the other day just to see what happens..
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
Thanks Kodak, that was exactly what the problem was. All working great now.kodak80 wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 am I had the same issue recently with my ROM programmer and the PLCC to DIL adapters. The connections from the DIL pins have 2 pins wired to NC pins on the PLCC socket!
You need a couple of bodge wires to connect the PLCC socket pins together:
PLCC pins 12 and 13 need connecting together and pins 33 and 34 need connecting.
Once I made these changes I was able to program 27c4096 PLCC chips.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
- rubber_jonnie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13041
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:40 pm
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
I'll also try this. Got my 1.04/2.06 ROM today and will look at getting the existing ROMs removed from my test board, or swapping to another, this weekend.PhilC wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:10 pmThanks Kodak, that was exactly what the problem was. All working great now.kodak80 wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 am I had the same issue recently with my ROM programmer and the PLCC to DIL adapters. The connections from the DIL pins have 2 pins wired to NC pins on the PLCC socket!
You need a couple of bodge wires to connect the PLCC socket pins together:
PLCC pins 12 and 13 need connecting together and pins 33 and 34 need connecting.
Once I made these changes I was able to program 27c4096 PLCC chips.
Going to have to wait on a few more parts to do the resistor/capacitor patch on the select1/2 jumpers though

Collector of many retro things!
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
Phil, out of queriousity did you run the speed test?PhilC wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2019 7:20 pm Will download the test program in a mo but here's the requested photos
20190410_191746.jpg
20190410_191736.jpg
Device type is a Toshiba THNCF2G04QG 2.0GB, formatted to 4 partitions.
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
Which one Paul? I've run Gembench but that's not IDE related obviously.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
With the disk driver there is RateHD.prg that provides a bytes/sec transfer rate. With the ultasatan and ICD driver it comes with I get 896 K/s. On the falcon I get ~1690 K/s using ICD driver. I attribute the speed increase to 16 bit transfer vs a 8 bit for the ultrasatan.PhilC wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:31 pm Which one Paul? I've run Gembench but that's not IDE related obviously.
I received the 245's yesterday and installed. Still waiting on IDE2SD adaptors. Should be here Monday.
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
I think the speed was about 1420kb/s , Icky probably remembers better... Though it is somewhat irrelevant anyway, as speed is determined by CPU transfer speed which is bottlenecked by RAM anyway. Speed of the interface is irrelevant as it is not much more than a address decoder.. Which runs at about 10ns decoding speed, or 100MHz.
You also cannot actually say the interface is fast or slow as it will quite easily run whatever speed the CPU and hard drive is capable of. This particular interface runs in just one bus cycle. So it is totally impossible to speed this up any more on the stock system.
In terms of accelerators, this is not tested, but it is also a little irrelevant. As while the accelerator may well access the hard drive at twice the speed for a theoretical 2840kb/s, it is still bottlenecked by ST-RAM. It is possible a small boost may be there, but likely not much, or nothing at all.
However I believe HD10 has a option to run the driver in alt-ram. So theoretically if there was alt-ram running at 16MHz with the CPU, then the IDE speed will of course double that over 8 MHz. But to my knowledge nobody has ever created a "fast ram" board for the STFM.. It is on my to do list among the other 500 things...
You also cannot actually say the interface is fast or slow as it will quite easily run whatever speed the CPU and hard drive is capable of. This particular interface runs in just one bus cycle. So it is totally impossible to speed this up any more on the stock system.
In terms of accelerators, this is not tested, but it is also a little irrelevant. As while the accelerator may well access the hard drive at twice the speed for a theoretical 2840kb/s, it is still bottlenecked by ST-RAM. It is possible a small boost may be there, but likely not much, or nothing at all.
However I believe HD10 has a option to run the driver in alt-ram. So theoretically if there was alt-ram running at 16MHz with the CPU, then the IDE speed will of course double that over 8 MHz. But to my knowledge nobody has ever created a "fast ram" board for the STFM.. It is on my to do list among the other 500 things...
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
So, do you attribute the ~60% speed increase to software or hardware?
Re: ST-IDE-ROM Dev Board v1 - BETA Testers
Where are you getting that 60% figure from ?PaulJ wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:57 pm So, do you attribute the ~60% speed increase to software or hardware?