You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE !
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk:8085/IP_CHECK/
You can unban yourself if needed. It also sends me reports to investigate the ban.
DO NOT USE MOBILE / CGNAT DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time, it is unfortunately not possible to whitelist users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
PAK issues
-
rubber_jonnie
- Site Admin

- Posts: 14801
- Joined: 17 Aug 2017 19:40
- Location: Essex
Re: PAK issues
Just a reminder, there is a list of 020 PAK jumper settings in the PAK 68/20 repository here: https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... ory#p16799
Collector of many retro things!
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
-
exxos
- Site Admin

- Posts: 28217
- Joined: 16 Aug 2017 23:19
- Location: UK
Re: PAK issues
I burned new UK TOS for my pak , RJ had it working in his machine. I think the original was German .
Looks like I had German TOS when I did my benchmarks https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... f=42&t=571
I don't know is any patches were done with the German TOS or not. I don't know how much testing was done by RJ... But I never got it to boot again after that benchmark.. I'm sure I had UK TOS working before I took the pak out if my board. Either way, as it worked in RJ machine, not mine, then UK TOS should at least boot.
I half think though this is all down to bad PCB layout. It seems very hit and miss which cpus work. I think my problems started when I add more caps on the back of the CPU. I removed them later but was ever able to boot again.
I sent all my 020 CPUs to RJ also to test where most of them worked for him. For me, there was I think one or 2 CPUs which would just give a row of bombs on the screen . that was as good as I could get it. Most of the CPUs were just totally dead to me. I also recall frank had issues with only some cpus working. Which if why I brought my CPU from him as known working. Though it got mixed up with my others or lost.
Looks like I had German TOS when I did my benchmarks https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... f=42&t=571
I don't know is any patches were done with the German TOS or not. I don't know how much testing was done by RJ... But I never got it to boot again after that benchmark.. I'm sure I had UK TOS working before I took the pak out if my board. Either way, as it worked in RJ machine, not mine, then UK TOS should at least boot.
I half think though this is all down to bad PCB layout. It seems very hit and miss which cpus work. I think my problems started when I add more caps on the back of the CPU. I removed them later but was ever able to boot again.
I sent all my 020 CPUs to RJ also to test where most of them worked for him. For me, there was I think one or 2 CPUs which would just give a row of bombs on the screen . that was as good as I could get it. Most of the CPUs were just totally dead to me. I also recall frank had issues with only some cpus working. Which if why I brought my CPU from him as known working. Though it got mixed up with my others or lost.
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7426
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: PAK issues
Ok, I have 5 mins, hopefully post photos of boards later but for no the jeds are:
030:
U1 p13_50d.jed
u2 p2_51.jed 32-50mhz
u3 p3_puk_a.jed
u4 v4_50ac.jed
u5 v5_51a.jed
u6 p6_st.jed
020:
I dont have version nos for these but have tried U12_21 and U12_24
both have 32mhz oscillators on them.
030:
U1 p13_50d.jed
u2 p2_51.jed 32-50mhz
u3 p3_puk_a.jed
u4 v4_50ac.jed
u5 v5_51a.jed
u6 p6_st.jed
020:
I dont have version nos for these but have tried U12_21 and U12_24
both have 32mhz oscillators on them.
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
rubber_jonnie
- Site Admin

- Posts: 14801
- Joined: 17 Aug 2017 19:40
- Location: Essex
Re: PAK issues
exxos, pretty sure your PAK/20 had UK TOS when I tested it, as the menus etc were in English, not German. I tested your board quite a bit with various games and Gembench and it ran just fine, well at least until I swapped out the CPUs for testing, at which point some worked, some didn't, and if I recall, I marked the bad ones as such.exxos wrote: 27 Jan 2019 11:45 I burned new UK TOS for my pak , RJ had it working in his machine. I think the original was German .
Looks like I had German TOS when I did my benchmarks https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... f=42&t=571
I don't know is any patches were done with the German TOS or not. I don't know how much testing was done by RJ... But I never got it to boot again after that benchmark.. I'm sure I had UK TOS working before I took the pak out if my board. Either way, as it worked in RJ machine, not mine, then UK TOS should at least boot.
I half think though this is all down to bad PCB layout. It seems very hit and miss which cpus work. I think my problems started when I add more caps on the back of the CPU. I removed them later but was ever able to boot again.
I sent all my 020 CPUs to RJ also to test where most of them worked for him. For me, there was I think one or 2 CPUs which would just give a row of bombs on the screen . that was as good as I could get it. Most of the CPUs were just totally dead to me. I also recall frank had issues with only some cpus working. Which if why I brought my CPU from him as known working. Though it got mixed up with my others or lost.
It was, as my PAK is, sensitive to PSU output though, so I had to make sure I used a good re-capped PSU with it.
The other thing that I did, which may have been different to you (both), is removing the old 68K CPU and installing a socket in it's place. The jumpers on my PAK are set to assume no original CPU.
I did also try it in a board with a 68K CPU still installed, but with a socket on top, but it was massively unstable. By that I mean sometimes it would boot, but when trying disk access of any sort, it was never long before it hung or gave me varying displays of bombs. And yes, I did change the jumper settings. I do need to try this board again without the Blitter installed to be fair.
As soon as I moved it back to the original test board with no original CPU, all back to stable and lovely.
The other slight difference between my board and exxos' was that his was an earlier revision and required some bodge wires, whereas mine was later and didn't need them according to Frank.
One other point that Frank made when I built mine (Also Redhawk 668) was that it won't work with the Blitter installed.
Oh, and one last thing with youurs exxos, it wouldn't work with an FPU installed. I had a 40Mhz 68882 that I run in mine which I tested in yours at CPU speed, 32Mhz and 40Mhz, and no joy. Ran a treat in mine.
Collector of many retro things!
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
800XL and 65XE both with Ultimate1MB,VBXL/XE & PokeyMax, SIDE3, SDrive Max, 2x 1010 cassette, 2x 1050 one with Happy mod, 3x 2600 Jr, 7800 and Lynx II
Approx 20 STs, including a 520 STM, 520 STFMs, 3x Mega ST, MSTE & 2x 32 Mhz boosted STEs
Plus the rest, totalling around 50 machines including a QL, 3x BBC Model B, Electron, Spectrums, ZX81 etc...
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7426
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: PAK issues
Thanks RJ, will try all those things later on as well as getting the other details for pakman
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
pakman
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 16 Feb 2018 22:04
- Location: Germany
Re: PAK issues
In your MegaST, was there a 68000 installed in parallel with the PAK?
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7426
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: PAK issues
I tried with and without the 68000 being installedpakman wrote: 27 Jan 2019 16:14 In your MegaST, was there a 68000 installed in parallel with the PAK?
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
pakman
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 16 Feb 2018 22:04
- Location: Germany
Re: PAK issues
When installed, was the the 68000 mounted on top of the PAK?
And did everything work properly with the 68000 enabled, and the PAK being disabled?
And did everything work properly with the 68000 enabled, and the PAK being disabled?
-
PhilC
- Moderator

- Posts: 7426
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018 20:22
Re: PAK issues
It was mounted on top but still didn't work but then I've not tried it since, so will re-try it too with another 68000pakman wrote: 27 Jan 2019 17:08 When installed, was the the 68000 mounted on top of the PAK?
And did everything work properly with the 68000 enabled, and the PAK being disabled?
If it ain't broke, test it to Destruction.
-
pakman
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 16 Feb 2018 22:04
- Location: Germany
Re: PAK issues
No further try and error.. we will start from scratch!
Let us go for the PAK030 first. I am waiting for your jumper settings and your photos of the PAK.
Let us go for the PAK030 first. I am waiting for your jumper settings and your photos of the PAK.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot and 36 guests