Hi PaulJ - To clarify my statement of the board being solid. It has been on solidly for several days and using only the floppy to run programs, looping GemBench and play games etc.PaulJ wrote: ↑Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:09 pm Good morning Icky. If its questionable I totally agree however I haven't had any issues. Board real-estate is precious and we shouldn't add fixes that are just in case. When all the boards are built and running we will have a better sample of operation reliably. You said yours is running reliably. What did you have to do to achieve the reliable operation, I know you were using a various different chips?
I am not using HDD at the moment as my Megafile bit the dust this morning (not related to STF) and only having one good Gigafile at the moment I am a bit wary of using it with the STF.
From the perspective of chips I am currently running with a new WD1772 from Exxos and a DMA -38 from my 520STM. I have no other spare DMA chip or WD1772 chip a part from my NASTY DMA labeled one and what I also believe to be a shot WD1772.
I agree we will have a better sample set as we gather more of these boards together. Also agree real-estate is precious.
I think as Exxos has said we have realised this flaw in the original design and we can fix.exxos wrote: ↑Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:17 pm The fixes are in part "just in case" but we know of issues now and they should be fixed. Let's do it right and not start down the path of the STE buggy DMA chaos ...
I have a imp chip set, that goes apesh*t on the ste, so be interesting if it works on my stf. The floppy does so far.