You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
Check if your IP is banned
viewtopic.php?t=7286

This is not a Falcon 030

General Discussion, STOS.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 25981
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: This is not a Falcon 030

Post by exxos »

viking272 wrote: Tue Jul 01, 2025 4:16 pm Willy posted a little about this on 8 Jan this year on the F030NG discord channel. The SV went on hold due to the silicon crisis a few years ago. The Ct60e license should still be valid he said.
Seems like he also had about 40x CT60e that failed tests that needed rectifying but they went on a shelf. We all struggle with mental health from time to time and Willy mentioned this too, with (too) many projects on the go, its a struggle to complete. Hopefully he's in a better place and Willy if you're reading, if any of us can help, please reach out. 🙏
Thanks for posting that :thumbup:

I often wonder what happened to the CT60e as it was a great project. I own one myself :)
User avatar
Badwolf
Site sponsor
Site sponsor
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 12:09 pm

Re: This is not a Falcon 030

Post by Badwolf »

Not wishing to hijack, but since the initial question appears resolved I hope it's not too bad:

What's the potted difference between the CT60, CT63, CT60e and any other variants, just out of interest?

BW
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
sety
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:47 am

Re: This is not a Falcon 030

Post by sety »

Badwolf wrote: Tue Jul 01, 2025 6:35 pm What's the potted difference between the CT60, CT63, CT60e and any other variants, just out of interest?
CT63 and CT60/e have programmable freq generators where as the ct60 uses an osc. ct63 doesn't have support for buss speeder. ct60/e does have the speeder circuit but it isn't populated. ct60/e uses the atari power header instead of the floppy drive power cable and I think (but not sure) that the ct60 has a different rom chip. There might be other differences, but those are the main ones
Steve
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:49 am

Re: This is not a Falcon 030

Post by Steve »

I think the ct60e was also built with thicker PCB layers/traces? Mine needed repairing once (cold solder joints) and my iron wasn't strong enough to melt the solder on any of the IC's lol
mikro
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 11:22 pm
Location: Kosice, Slovakia
Contact:

Re: This is not a Falcon 030

Post by mikro »

nokturnal wrote: Mon Jun 30, 2025 8:25 pm @mikro didn't know that, I remember there were some talks about fixing it (on fpga level?) by Nature, but don't remember how it ended with nothing at all..
Well, with the new SuperVidel in the works it's no surprise that fixing their old product isn't exactly #1 priority.
User avatar
Badwolf
Site sponsor
Site sponsor
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 12:09 pm

Re: This is not a Falcon 030

Post by Badwolf »

sety wrote: Wed Jul 02, 2025 4:38 am There might be other differences, but those are the main ones
:thanksyellow:

BW
DFB1 Open source 50MHz 030 and TT-RAM accelerator for the Falcon
Smalliermouse ST-optimised USB mouse adapter based on SmallyMouse2
FrontBench The Frontier: Elite 2 intro as a benchmark
sety
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:47 am

Re: This is not a Falcon 030

Post by sety »

Steve wrote: Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:04 am I think the ct60e was also built with thicker PCB layers/traces? Mine needed repairing once (cold solder joints) and my iron wasn't strong enough to melt the solder on any of the IC's lol
I feel that pain... The thermal reliefs are almost non existent.
Post Reply

Return to “SOFTWARE”