Got them to order the other types which will hopefully fit. Just they are sooooooo slow to get anything done. You will not be able to post if you are still using Microsoft email addresses such as Hotmail etc
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
See here for more information viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7296
DO NOT USE DEVICES WHERE THE IP CHANGES CONSTANTLY!
At this time it is unfortunately not possible to white list users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
At this time it is unfortunately not possible to white list users when your IP changes constantly.
You may inadvertently get banned because a previous attack may have used the IP you are now on.
So I suggest people only use fixed IP address devices until I can think of a solution for this problem!
CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
The PCB is still at the PCB company. So found the buffers are in 2 different size packages Got them to order the other types which will hopefully fit. Just they are sooooooo slow to get anything done.
Got them to order the other types which will hopefully fit. Just they are sooooooo slow to get anything done. Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
Just got this image from fab 
- 172854 (1) (1).png (837.71 KiB) Viewed 3230 times
Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
is this canned now the ST536 is out? No posts in 2 years?
Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
AGrred, what the status of the project, is it abandoned ?
I made some benchmark at the RAM is the slower in the STE
I made some benchmark at the RAM is the slower in the STE
- ScreenShot007.png (122.64 KiB) Viewed 85 times
Re: CURRENT PROTOTYPE STATUS (SEC 64MHz 68000)
I just don't have time to work on it at the moment but with the 536 being a better accelerator, it really is questionable if it's worth continuing anyway. It was mostly just an experiment to get the fastest 68k system. But with its intention being for the phoenix platform and it's having upgrades very slowly anyway.. The SEC CPU will likely move to that project, but won't be a standalone accelerator.
Thanks, great tests! it would probably be better if you put it in the benchmark section and explain exactly what the tests were.I made some benchmark at the RAM is the slower in the STE
I'm locking this thread as I don't plan to work on this project for the foreseeable future.. To many projects soaking up my time as it is.