absolutely on your own there.apolkosnik wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 8:58 pm Would that be on the stock 3V3 regulator or do we need to bump it to 3V5?
TF1260 New firmware progress
Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
Triple fried chip ram speed, nice!
I keep thinking of your dungeon and Young Frankenstein. Make sure you don't upload the CPLD file titled 'Abby Normal'
Have you managed to look at the IDE TF issue when overclocking?
Also with your new coding, how are the thermals. CPLDs still 'balls to the wall' and warming the dungeon in this cold weather or are they more relaxed and sipping a Pina colada on the silicon beach?
I keep thinking of your dungeon and Young Frankenstein. Make sure you don't upload the CPLD file titled 'Abby Normal'
Have you managed to look at the IDE TF issue when overclocking?
Also with your new coding, how are the thermals. CPLDs still 'balls to the wall' and warming the dungeon in this cold weather or are they more relaxed and sipping a Pina colada on the silicon beach?
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
The CPLDs are even hotter.. They're moving more data...
I've not got write burst working yet.
I've not got write burst working yet.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
I've also seen some a1k.org people (including Jens) whine that i'm leaving performance on the table by not caching ROM. My thought process on this is twofold..
1. ROM is already stupid fast.
2. Most people use an MMU CPU and have MUFastRom running.
3. Based on 1 its a waste of cache. Cache the things that are slow.
Hence i dont mark ROM as cacheable. I think we get better results this way.
1. ROM is already stupid fast.
2. Most people use an MMU CPU and have MUFastRom running.
3. Based on 1 its a waste of cache. Cache the things that are slow.
Hence i dont mark ROM as cacheable. I think we get better results this way.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
- GadgetUK164
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:26 pm
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
Performance is looking incredible there =O I would't bother with dedicate ROM caching when MMU gives good enough performance there. It's looking super fast from those benchmarks!
My YouTube Channel - www.youtube.com/GadgetUK164
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
Figures look great!
- apolkosnik
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2019 8:23 pm
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
Great numbers!
Though, the earlier versions than SysInfo 4.4 will show some greater numbers for the chip mem speed, so perhaps it would be good to run 4.4.
Though, the earlier versions than SysInfo 4.4 will show some greater numbers for the chip mem speed, so perhaps it would be good to run 4.4.
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2020 11:42 am
- Location: Zielona Gora
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
Better 4.5b12 because it shows instead of chip speed vs A600, straight CHIP FAST and ROM speed in megabytes per secondapolkosnik wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:36 pm Great numbers!
Though, the earlier versions than SysInfo 4.4 will show some greater numbers for the chip mem speed, so perhaps it would be good to run 4.4.
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Glasgow, UK
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
Bustest is how I measure memory speed. Can’t be bothered upgrading my 20 images to new versions.
———
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
"It is not necessarily a supply voltage at no load, but the amount of current it can provide when touched that
indicates how much hurting you shall receive."
Re: TF1260 New firmware progress
wow those numbers are looking really nice! What a great piece of art