Probably the tantalum recommendation on the datasheet has to do more with the time the LM1117 was brought to market. And further revisions of the document probably didn't bother analyzing current day alternatives. But the datasheet hints at the ESR (aside the capacitance itself) as an important factor for stability, so I'm sure valid alternatives (even using a capacitor+resistor) could be used instead of tantalum if needed.terriblefire wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 2:55 pm Yes I have empirically shown than LM1117s do not need tantalum caps. They work fine without it. Datasheets, despite what people think, are often wrong and frequently works of fiction
But in any case, the specific use of the LM1117 done here and in most circuits, where an already regulated +5V is fed to its input, probably doesn't require those conservative "works-in-all-scenarios" values as the regulation is way more easy than if the LM1117 was used in more harsh conditions with randomly fluctuating input voltages.